2009
DOI: 10.1080/13803390802508926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test

Abstract: The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPT) is a nonverbal measure of semantic memory that has been frequently used in previous aphasia, agnosia, and dementia research. Very little psychometric information regarding the PPT is available. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the PPT in a population of healthy college students. Results indicated that the PPT achieved poor test-retest reliability, failed to obtain adequate internal consistency, and demonstrated poor convergent va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these tests but the WAIS are designed to screen and detect deficits in patients. However, normative studies focused on these tests show inter-individual variability in healthy subjects’ performances with a relative standard deviation (i.e., rSD = standard deviation/mean) of 4–12% in the PPT test ( Howard and Patterson, 1992 ; Rami et al, 2008 ; Klein and Buchanan, 2009 ; Gamboz et al, 2009 ; Callahan et al, 2010 ), an rSD of 25–45% in the similarities subtest of the WAIS ( Wechsler, 2008 ; Wisdom et al, 2012 ; Harrison et al, 2014 ), an rSD of 20–40% in the D-KEFS sorting test ( Delis et al, 2001 ; Homack et al, 2005 ; Mattioli et al, 2014 ), and an rSD of 20%–60% in the number of categories found in the WCST ( Caffarra et al, 2004 ; Shan et al, 2008 ; Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2015 ). Whether this inter-individual variability in categorization tasks is related to variability in brain structure remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these tests but the WAIS are designed to screen and detect deficits in patients. However, normative studies focused on these tests show inter-individual variability in healthy subjects’ performances with a relative standard deviation (i.e., rSD = standard deviation/mean) of 4–12% in the PPT test ( Howard and Patterson, 1992 ; Rami et al, 2008 ; Klein and Buchanan, 2009 ; Gamboz et al, 2009 ; Callahan et al, 2010 ), an rSD of 25–45% in the similarities subtest of the WAIS ( Wechsler, 2008 ; Wisdom et al, 2012 ; Harrison et al, 2014 ), an rSD of 20–40% in the D-KEFS sorting test ( Delis et al, 2001 ; Homack et al, 2005 ; Mattioli et al, 2014 ), and an rSD of 20%–60% in the number of categories found in the WCST ( Caffarra et al, 2004 ; Shan et al, 2008 ; Arango-Lasprilla et al, 2015 ). Whether this inter-individual variability in categorization tasks is related to variability in brain structure remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the semantic deficits in aMCI patients may have been too mild to be detected with the PPTT. Moreover, there is recent evidence suggesting that the PPTT may lack reliability and validity (Klein & Buchanan, 2009). Alternatively, there may have been a mild lexical access problem in the depressed group, unrelated to any semantic deficit.…”
Section: Semantic Memory and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLTs outlined a plethora of preoperative language and cognitive assessments for service users undergoing AC with a diverse range of formal, standardised assessments; The Boston Naming Test (Kaplan, Goodglass & Weintrub, 2000), Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Springer and Mantey, 2010) and Pyramids and Palm Trees (Klein and Buchanan, 2009) were frequently used preoperative language assessments. Furthermore, AC SLTs reported a diverse range of informal language preoperative testing methods (Table 4).…”
Section: Preoperative Practices and Skill Setmentioning
confidence: 99%