2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0277-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey with a General Population Sample of Undergraduate Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
36
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mean score at BDI‐2 was indicative of a mild depression level, more than a third of the patients had marked signs of mood reduction. With regard to the other two psychosocial variables included in our study, GSE was about 7.5% lower than the mean value reported by the Italian subsample in the large GSE validation study, and the mean value MOS‐SSS was about 5% lower than the value found in the validation study . Previous studies found significant correlations between disability, QoL, and depression in samples of patients with chronic forms of headache .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the mean score at BDI‐2 was indicative of a mild depression level, more than a third of the patients had marked signs of mood reduction. With regard to the other two psychosocial variables included in our study, GSE was about 7.5% lower than the mean value reported by the Italian subsample in the large GSE validation study, and the mean value MOS‐SSS was about 5% lower than the value found in the validation study . Previous studies found significant correlations between disability, QoL, and depression in samples of patients with chronic forms of headache .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Perceived social support was evaluated with the Medical Outcome Study‐Social Support Survey (MOS‐SSS), which is a measure of the support an individual deems he/she is receiving by persons that may be helpful or caring in various aspects of life. For each of the 19 items, patients indicate on a 5‐point scale (from 1 – none of the time, to 5 – all of the time) how often each kind of support (emotional, tangible, affective, and positive social interaction) was available to them if they needed it.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess caregivers' QoL, psychological burden (in terms of anxiety, depressive symptoms, prolonged grief disorder, coping strategies and anger) and level of perceived social support, the following questionnaires were selected: The World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHO-QOL-BREF) (30,31); State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y (STAI-Y) (32,33), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) (34,35), Prolonged Grief Disorder Questionnaire (PG-12) (36,37), Coping Orientations to Problem Experiences (COPE) (38,39), State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2) (40,41) and the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) (42,43).…”
Section: Assessment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes multiple dimensions of support: 'Emotional and Informational Support' (EMI), measuring the expression of positive affect, empathetic understanding, and encouragement feeling expression and the provisions of advice; 'Tangible Support' (TAN), measuring the offering of material aid or behavioural assistance; 'Affectionate Support' (AFF), measuring the expressions of love and affection; 'Positive Social Interaction' (POS), measuring the availability of other persons to do fun things with you. Linear transformation (mean score-MIN)/ (MAX-MIN) 9 100) was used with both factors and overall scores so that the transformed scores range from 0 to 100 (42,43).…”
Section: Assessment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most subsequent studies have been among patients with health conditions [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10]. Two focused on carers of people with health conditions [2,11], and two used community samples of 485 university students [12], and 4,444 community-based householders aged 55? [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%