Psychometric properties of the impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire

Cardol, Mieke; Haan, Rob J. de; Jong, B. A. De; Bos, G.A.M. van den; Groot, I. de

doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.18218

Cited by 284 publications

(304 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

281

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For each domain, an overall score for the participation items is calculated, as well as one overall score for the eight problem-related experience items. The IPA is able to detect important within-person improvement over time, and its reliability and validity have been found to be good [48][49].…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

Eyssen¹,

Steultjens²,

Oud³

et al. 2011

JRRD

127

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This study evaluated the responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), an individualized, client-centered outcome measure for the identification and evaluation of self-perceived occupational performance problems. We recruited 152 consecutive patients with various diagnoses, admitted to the outpatient clinic of two occupational therapy departments, to complete a COPM interview and three self-reported health status questionnaires on two occasions: prior to the start of occupational therapy treatment and 3 months later. The three questionnaires were the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68), the Disability and Impact Profile (DIP), and the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA). We assessed criterion responsiveness by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic curve and the optimal cutoff values for the COPM scores. To determine construct responsiveness, we calculated correlations between the change in COPM scores and the change in the SIP68, DIP, and IPA scores. The AUC ranged from 0.79 to 0.85, and the optimal cut-off values for the performance scores and satisfaction scores ranged from 0.9 to 1.9. We found significant positive correlations between the COPM scores and the SIP68, DIP, and IPA scores. The capability of the COPM to detect changes in perceived occupational performance issues is supported.

show abstract

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The IPA measures self-perceived participation [48][49]. The IPA, a self-administered generic questionnaire, assesses the impact of a condition on two different aspects of participation.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

Eyssen¹,

Steultjens²,

Oud³

et al. 2011

JRRD

127

109

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It includes subscales of social relations, autonomy in self-care, mobility and leisure, family role, and work and educational opportunities. Studies have supported its reliability, validity, and factor structure among persons with SCI [18,[68][69][70]. Limitations of the IPA include some floor and ceiling effects and relatively less use empirically than other activity and participation measures [15,71].…”

Section: Participation Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Activity and participation after spinal cord injury: State-of-the-art report

Ullrich¹,

Spungen²,

Atkinson³

et al. 2012

JRRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The importance of activities and community participation for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) has been recognized for decades and yet theoretical and empirical advances have been limited. This report summarizes the recommendations for researchers on the topic of measuring activity and participation among persons with SCI formulated by the Spinal Cord Injury workgroup at the State-of-the-Art Conference on Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation held in January 2010. Activity and participation were defined as independent constructs ideally measured in reference to personal values and environmental influences. Measures of activity, participation, and factors influencing activity and participation are reviewed and critiqued. Gaps in available measures are described, measures in development are discussed, and suggestions for future research are made.

show abstract

“…5 Determining the outcome of interventions designed to improve participation of wheelchair users provides critical feedback to clients, therapists and agencies that provide funding for equipment. As participation reflects the fulfillment of personal roles, 6 individual identification and appraisal of participation outcomes is critical. 7 A number of measures exist that provide information regarding a range of wheelchair-oriented outcomes; however, the majority of these do not measure outcomes at the level of participation and only one enables identification of participation outcomes that are important to the individual.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties of the wheelchair outcome measure in individuals with spinal cord injury

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study design: One-week retest methodological study. Objectives: To assess the reliability and validity of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) in a sample of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Methods: The WhOM measures the impact of wheelchair interventions on a user's self-selected participation outcomes. The WhOM was administered to 50 participants on two occasions by the same rater, 1 week apart, to assess test-retest reliability. To determine inter-rater reliability, the WhOM was administered a third time approximately 72 h later by a different rater. Validity was evaluated by correlating scores from the WhOM with scores from the Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H). Results: The test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC 2, 2 ) for the WhOM satisfaction (Sat) and WhOM importance (Impt) Â Sat scores were 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.90) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.93), respectively. The inter-rater ICC for the WhOM Sat and WhOM Impt Â Sat scores were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.94), respectively. As hypothesized, most scores on the WhOM were fair to moderate (r ¼ 0.3-0.5) and positively correlated with scores on the LIFE-H. Conclusion: The WhOM is a new outcome measure that demonstrates good reliability and validity among individuals with SCI. It is designed to assist wheelchair users identify and evaluate the impact of wheelchair interventions on participation level outcomes. The WhOM may be applicable for clinicalor research-oriented purposes.

show abstract

Psychometric properties of the impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire

Cited by 284 publications

References 20 publications

Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure

Activity and participation after spinal cord injury: State-of-the-art report

Measurement properties of the wheelchair outcome measure in individuals with spinal cord injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About