2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10194-009-0143-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Danish versions of Headache-Specific Locus of Control Scale and Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to test the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of a Danish version of the Headache-Specific Locus of Control Scale (HSLC) and the Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale (HMSE) in a tertiary headache centre. HSLC and HMSE are headache-specific measures of locus of control (LOC) and SE. The Danish versions of the HSLC and the HMSE were created according to the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. The HSLC and HMSE were administered to 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(52 reference statements)
3
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, the results suggest that the HMSE-G and the HMSE-G-SF are reliable and valid measures of headache-specific self-efficacy. These results add to the previous HMSE literature by enriching the findings of the original English long version 24 and the Danish long version, 48 eg, with measures of responsiveness and by contributing a new abbreviated measure of this import construct.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Taken together, the results suggest that the HMSE-G and the HMSE-G-SF are reliable and valid measures of headache-specific self-efficacy. These results add to the previous HMSE literature by enriching the findings of the original English long version 24 and the Danish long version, 48 eg, with measures of responsiveness and by contributing a new abbreviated measure of this import construct.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Martin and colleagues report adequate internal consistency across all 3 components ( α ’s ranging from 0.84 to 0.88) and provide initial evidence of construct validity . A handful of studies provide further evidence of internal consistency ( α ’s ranging from 0.71 to 0.88) and construct validity as demonstrated by typically moderate associations between HSLC and headache‐related beliefs (self‐efficacy and pain catastrophizing), and typically small associations between HSLC and psychiatric symptoms (anxiety and depression), migraine‐specific quality of life, and disability …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…10 A handful of studies provide further evidence of internal consistency (α's ranging from 0.71 to 0.88) and construct validity as demonstrated by typically moderate associations between HSLC and headache-related beliefs (self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing), and typically small associations between HSLC and psychiatric symptoms (anxiety and depression), migraine-specific quality of life, and disability. [13][14][15][16] Research guidelines and funding agencies recommend assessing putative therapeutic mechanisms, such as HSLC, in behavioral treatment trials. 17,18 Empirical information about these beliefs and their relationship with migraine outcomes is essential to evaluate the active components of the existing treatments and to develop modifications or new treatments to more optimally treat migraine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locus of Control (LoC) is related to the impact of headaches and chronic pain [ 3 ]. The extent patients believe they can control events affecting their pain is influenced by the degree of LoC [ 4 , 5 ]. Individuals with internal LoC believe that events in their life derive primarily from their own actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%