2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of Honey & Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
56
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the models dealing with how people take in and possess information is Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles. Honey and Mumford's LSQ has subsequently been applied to a wide range of subjects, including students in higher education (Duff & Duffy, 2002 others, thinking through before acting on them, and working at their own pace. These behaviors allow them to be thorough and careful (Honey & Mumford, 2000).…”
Section: The Second Instrument Was Honey and Mumford's Learning Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the models dealing with how people take in and possess information is Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles. Honey and Mumford's LSQ has subsequently been applied to a wide range of subjects, including students in higher education (Duff & Duffy, 2002 others, thinking through before acting on them, and working at their own pace. These behaviors allow them to be thorough and careful (Honey & Mumford, 2000).…”
Section: The Second Instrument Was Honey and Mumford's Learning Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was developed to be used specifically in industry and management [41]. Although it has applied in learning settings, Duff and Duffy [78] concluded that the level of consistency of this questionnaire is modest and is not appropriate to be an alternative to Kolb's LSI as well as using it in the education level of universities is 'premature'. However, a highly cited study of Grigoriadou et al [13] used this questionnaire to personalise INSPIRE system.…”
Section: Group Embedded Figure Test (Geft)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these constructs have proven notoriously difficult to validate for both the stable assessment of learner characteristics and the customization of instruction to improve student outcomes (e.g. Duff & Duffy, 2002;Henson & Hwang, 2002;Kavale & Forness, 1987;Loo, 1997, Richardson, 2000, Stahl, 1999. In general, cognitive style theories posit one or more linear scales on which learners can score closer to one extreme or another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%