2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09553-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties of Computerized Cognitive Tools and Standard Neuropsychological Tests Used to Assess Sport Concussion: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this filtering could potentially reduce the possibility of overfitting and over predicting in both the EFA and CFA models. Finally, we note that the self-report trait-like metrics of cognition that we did retain may have more test-retest reliability than computerized neurocognitive performance measures [42], where, for example, self-report versus laboratory task-derived metrics of impulsivity typically correlate poorly within-subject [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, this filtering could potentially reduce the possibility of overfitting and over predicting in both the EFA and CFA models. Finally, we note that the self-report trait-like metrics of cognition that we did retain may have more test-retest reliability than computerized neurocognitive performance measures [42], where, for example, self-report versus laboratory task-derived metrics of impulsivity typically correlate poorly within-subject [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, access to manual NPAs is limited by a shortage of licensed clinicians to administer, score, and interpret test results. Computerized NPAs can address these shortcomings ( Wild et al, 2008 ; Cole et al, 2018 ; Rao, 2018 ; Bilder and Reise, 2019 ; Sternin et al, 2019 ; Tsoy et al, 2021 ; Ashford et al, 2022 ; Jutten et al, 2022 ; Libon et al, 2022 ; Tavabi et al, 2022 ; Wilmoth et al, 2022 ). However, with rare exceptions ( Mackin et al, 2022 ), existing computerized NPAs do not incorporate verbal tests which constitute the majority of manually administered cognitive tests ( Rabin et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In youth athletes, NBT may be of limited value owing to neurocognitive development and poor discriminative ability beyond the initial (i.e., post-24-h) period following a concussion (4,5). Moreover, NBT demonstrates low test re-test reliability (24)(25)(26)(27); this is particularly problematic in youth sports where cognitive development is dynamic (4,5). Natural variability in cognitive abilities due to personal and contextual factors (e.g., academic stress) and purposefully underperforming (i.e., "sandbagging") on baseline testing also compromises the validity of baseline testing (28)(29)(30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%