2002
DOI: 10.1177/1073191102238197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Properties and Predictive Validity of the Mt Scale of the MMPI-2

Abstract: The College Maladjustment (Mt) Scale is a 41-item supplementary scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. It was designed to identify college students classified as maladjusted. Very little research has been conducted on the Mt Scale in the 40 years since its inception. The current study had the following four goals: (a) provide additional data on the internal consistency reliability, (b) examine the relationship between Mt Scale scores and various school-related domains, (c) examine the relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high score on this scale indicates a lack of adjustment in college. In the original sample it obtained an alpha of .85 (Lauterbach, Garcia, & Gloster, 2002). In the present sample this measure possessed an alpha level of .87.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…A high score on this scale indicates a lack of adjustment in college. In the original sample it obtained an alpha of .85 (Lauterbach, Garcia, & Gloster, 2002). In the present sample this measure possessed an alpha level of .87.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Responses are scored in the maladjustment direction, with higher scores measuring anxiety, inefficacy, pessimism, somatization, and the experience of life as a strain most of the time. The Mt scale shows acceptable internal consistency, concurrent validity with established indices of general maladjustment, and predictive validity with such criteria as grade‐point average and history of psychological treatment (Lauterbach, Garcia, & Gloster, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wilderman (1984) and Stewart (1994) examined mean differences between groups of maladjusted and adjusted college students. Other studies examined classification accuracy rates to establish cut-off scores on the Mt scale to classify students into maladjusted and adjusted groups (Kuczka & Handal, 1990;Lauterbach, Garcia, & Gloster, 2002;Svanum & Ehrmann, 1993). All of the past concurrent validity studies support the conclusion that the Mt scale discriminates among groups of adjusted and maladjusted college students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%