Psychometric properties and longitudinal validation of the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20) in a Rwandan community setting: a validation study

Abstract

BackgroundThis study took place to enable the measurement of the effects on mental health of a psychosocial intervention in Rwanda. It aimed to establish the capacities of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) to screen for mental disorder and to assess symptom change over time in a Rwandan community setting.MethodsThe SRQ-20 was translated into Kinyarwanda in a process of forward and back-translation. SRQ-20 data were collected in a Rwandan setting on 418 respondents; a random subsample of 230 respondents was assessed a second time with a three month time interval. Internal reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. The optimal cut-off point was determined by calculating Receiver Operating Curves, using semi-structured clinical interviews as standard in a random subsample of 99 respondents. Subsequently, predictive value, likelihood ratio, and interrater agreement were calculated. The factor structure of the SRQ-20 was determined through exploratory factor analysis. Factorial invariance over time was tested in a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsThe reliability of the SRQ-20 in women (α = 0.85) and men (α = 0.81) could be considered good. The instrument performed moderately well in detecting common mental disorders, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 for women and 0.74 for men. Cut-off scores were different for women (10) and men (8). Factor analysis yielded five factors, explaining 38% of the total variance. The factor structure proved to be time invariant.ConclusionsThe SRQ-20 can be used as a screener to detect mental disorder in a Rwandan community setting, but cut-off scores need to be adjusted for women and men separately. The instrument also shows longitudinal factorial invariance, which is an important prerequisite for assessing changes in symptom severity. This is a significant finding as in non-western post-conflict settings the relevance of diagnostic categories is questionable. The use of the SRQ-20 can be considered an alternative option for measuring the effect of a psychosocial intervention on mental health.Trial registrationNederlands Trial Register NTR1120.

Measuring and Understanding Depression in Women in Kisoro, Uganda

“…Using the cut-off point for ''case-ness'' of 10 or higher recommended by Scholte, et al (2011), the overall prevalence of ''depression'' in this sample was 61.3%, ranging from 47.3% at PHC at MH, to 54.5% at CNC to 77.6% at KYB. That such high levels of depression were detected in this study from a convenience sample of the community suggests a degree of diagnostic misclassification.…”

“…Seven or higher is the cut-off for possible depression used by Aidoo and Harpham (2001), but other authors now advocate the use of a different cut-off point. Scholte et al (2011) found that the SRQ-20 performed most reliably as a predictor of CMD in women, in a Rwandan community setting, when the cut-off point was set at 10. In our study, the SRQ-20 results are reported using both the 7 or higher, and the 10 or higher cut-off points, but the cut -off point for participants to proceed to the interview phase was 7 or higher.…”

Survey of Psychological Distress Among the Undergraduate Students of Arts and Science Colleges in Mangalore, India

“…In a study conducted in Rwandan community setting, which analysed the psychometric property and validity of SRQ-20 as screening tool, it was found that the SRQ-20 is highly reliable tool for screening of non-psychotic common mental condition in population. [14] Statistical Analysis SPSS version 15 was used for statistical analysis of data.…”

Frequent coconut milk intake increases the risk of vascular disease in adults

“…Emotional stress was assessed using a self reporting questionnaire with 20 items (SRQ-20). (9) Respondents were said to experience stress if they answered "Yes" to minimally 6 out of 20 questions in the instrument.…”