2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40337-018-0232-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the diabetes eating problem survey – revised (DEPS-R) among adult males and females with type 1 diabetes

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough an increasing amount of research has now established good psychometric properties and a three-component factor structure of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey – Revised (DEPS-R) in pediatric samples with type 1 diabetes (T1D), research using adult samples has been limited and divergent. This study therefore aimed to investigate psychometric properties and test a three-factor model of the DEPS-R among adults with T1D.MethodsA total of 282 adults with T1D aged 18–79 years participated in the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

15
48
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
15
48
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It consists of 16 items whose answers are scored on a six-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 = never to 5 = always, in relation to frequency of the behavior). In line with previous research, scores equal to or higher than 20 were considered as suggesting high risk for DEB ( Saßmann et al, 2015 ; Wisting et al, 2018 , 2019 ). The DEPS-r is the most widely validated DEB tool for adolescents with T1D, and it has been demonstrated to possess high internal reliability and high concurrent/criterion validity when compared to a gold standard clinical interview; it also has convergent validity with significant correlations with other validated measures of eating disorders (i.e., EAT-12, EDI, SCOFF, and EDE-Q) ( Pursey et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It consists of 16 items whose answers are scored on a six-point Likert scale (ranging from 0 = never to 5 = always, in relation to frequency of the behavior). In line with previous research, scores equal to or higher than 20 were considered as suggesting high risk for DEB ( Saßmann et al, 2015 ; Wisting et al, 2018 , 2019 ). The DEPS-r is the most widely validated DEB tool for adolescents with T1D, and it has been demonstrated to possess high internal reliability and high concurrent/criterion validity when compared to a gold standard clinical interview; it also has convergent validity with significant correlations with other validated measures of eating disorders (i.e., EAT-12, EDI, SCOFF, and EDE-Q) ( Pursey et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Scores ≥ 20 are considered clinically significant and have been associated with higher HbA 1c [ 37 ]. Although originally validated with adolescent patients, the DEPS-R has been used with adults with T1D and has demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and construct validity among adult samples (e.g., [ 43 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores of 20 or more indicates a level of disturbed eating warranting further attention. The DEPS-R has been translated and validated among Norwegian adolescents (Wisting et al, 2013) and adults (Wisting et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%