Psychometric evaluation of the <scp>K</scp>orean version of the <scp>D</scp>iabetes <scp>S</scp>elf‐efficacy <scp>S</scp>cale among <scp>S</scp>outh <scp>K</scp>orean older adults with type 2 diabetes

Chang, Sun Ju; Song, Misoon

doi:10.1111/jocn.12133

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…PROMs that assess the level of self-efficacy (ie, people's belief in their capability to organize and execute the courses of action required to deal with prospective situa-SES bg [113]; DSEQ bh (Thai version) [114]; CDMSS-11 bi tions [107]) of patients with type 2 diabetes, whether in [115]; DSCAS bj [116]; DSES bk [116]; K-DSES bl [117]; Situ-general or in dealing with specific aspects of diabetes (eg, in taking medication [108]).…”

Section: Self-efficacy •mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The management of diabetes is complex. There is growing recognition of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a standardized method of obtaining an outlook on patients’ functional status and well-being. However, no systematic reviews have summarized the studies that investigate the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs. Objective Our aims were to conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs by evaluating the methodological quality and overall level of evidence of these PROMs and to categorize them based on the outcome measures assessed. Methods This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. The PROMs were evaluated with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Results A total of 363 articles evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs for diabetes in the adult population were identified, of which 238 unique PROMs from 248 studies reported in 209 articles were validated in the type 2 diabetes population. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 of 9 measurement properties include the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (C-PDQ), Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form (DSMI-20), and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in Hong Kong primary care patients (C-ITAS-HK), of which the C-PDQ has a “sufficient (+)” rating for >4 measurement properties. A total of 43 PROMs meet the COSMIN guidelines for recommendation for use. Conclusions This study identified and synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of 238 unique PROMs for patients with type 2 diabetes and categorized the PROMs according to their outcome measures. These findings may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate high-quality PROMs for clinical practice and research. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020180978; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020180978.

show abstract

Section: Self-efficacy •mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Wee¹,

Kwan²,

Loh³

et al. 2021

J Med Internet Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Individuals with a higher level of self-efficacy perform better diabetes self-management (Chang et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2019). Improving patients' self-efficacy by referring to diabetes management is important for achieving clinical control of diabetes (Huang, 2016;Lin et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of diabetes distress among older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indonesia

Asshiddiqi

Yodchai

Taniwattananon

2020

Journal of Research in Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Older persons living with diabetes have an obligation to change their daily lifestyle, which may contribute to diabetes distress. Furthermore, predictive factors of diabetes distress in older persons might be different from other age groups due to age-related factors. Aims The purpose of the study was to examine the predictive factors of diabetes distress in older persons diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Indonesia. Methods A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Participants were recruited from an outpatient department of a tertiary hospital in Klaten City, Central Java, Indonesia. Data were analysed using multiple linear regression with a stepwise method. Results A total 198 older persons were included in the study. The study demonstrated self-efficacy (β = −0.298, P < 0.01), spirituality (β = −0.139, P < 0.05), blood glucose (β = 0.134, P < 0.05), and non-supportive family behaviour (β = 0.135, P < 0.05) as the variables that could statistically predict diabetes distress in older persons with T2DM. Conclusions Self-efficacy is the strongest predictor of diabetes distress. Moreover, the findings can be used as evidence to guide identification and future management of diabetes distress among older persons with T2DM.

show abstract

“…Standardized mean differences will be used to describe the intervention effect sizes with regard to self-efficacy and diabetes knowledge. To calculate the standardized mean differences, the means, standard deviations, and change scores of the self-efficacy and knowledge evaluation scales will be recorded [13,[23][24][25][32][33][34][35].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Social Cognitive Theory–Based Interventions for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Smith¹,

García-Torres²,

Coughlin³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND For those living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), failing to engage in self-management behaviors leads to poor glycemic control. Social cognitive theory (SCT) has been shown to improve health behaviors by altering cognitive processes and increasing an individual’s belief in their ability to accomplish a task. OBJECTIVE We aim to present a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to systematically identify, evaluate, and analyze the effect of SCT-based interventions to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. METHODS This protocol follows the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Data sources will include PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, and data will be reviewed with the use of customized text mining software. Studies examining SCT-based behavioral interventions for adults diagnosed with T2DM in randomized controlled trials located in the outpatient setting will be included. Intervention effectiveness will be compared with routine care. Screening and data collection will be performed in multiple stages with three reviewers as follows: (1) an independent review of titles/abstracts, (2) a full review, and (3) data collection with alternating teams of two reviewers for disputes to be resolved by a third reviewer. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed by three reviewers using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Standardized mean differences will be used to describe the intervention effect sizes with regard to self-efficacy and diabetes knowledge. The raw mean difference of HbA1c will be provided in a random effects model and presented in a forest plot. The expected limitations of this study are incomplete data, the need to contact authors, and analysis of various types of glycemic control measures accurately within the same data set. RESULTS This protocol was granted institutional review board exemption on October 7, 2019. PROSPERO registration (ID: CRD42020147105) was received on April 28, 2020. The review began on April 29, 2020. The results of the review will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals, and meetings. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review will appraise the effectiveness of SCT-based interventions for adults diagnosed with T2DM and provide the most effective interventions for improving health behaviors in these patients. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42020147105; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=147105 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/17148

show abstract

Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self‐efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes

Abstract: The Korean version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale can allow healthcare providers to effectively measure self-efficacy related to diabetes self-management so that they can provide the appropriate and adequate nursing care to Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Cited by 11 publications

References 35 publications

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Predictors of diabetes distress among older persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Indonesia

Effectiveness of Social Cognitive Theory–Based Interventions for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About