2011
DOI: 10.1177/1534508411413254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric Evaluation of a Receptive Vocabulary Test for Greek Elementary Students

Abstract: Assessment of lexical/semantic knowledge is performed with a variety of tests varying in response requirements. The present study exemplifies the application of modern statistical approaches in the adaptation and assessment of the psychometric properties of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised (PPVT-R) Greek. Confirmatory factor analyses applied to data from a large sample of elementary school students ( N = 585) indicated the existence of a single vocabulary dimension and differential item functioning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
49
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as having theoretical implications, the ability to differentiate among subtypes of dyslexia is vitally important for educationalists and clinicians for the purposes of effective intervention. (Naglieri, 1985), b Digit Span subtest from the Athena Test (Paraskevopoulos et al, 1999), c Reading fluency (Panteliadou & Antoniou, 2007), d Single word spelling (Mouzaki et al, 2007), e PPVT adapted for Greek (Simos et al, 2011).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As well as having theoretical implications, the ability to differentiate among subtypes of dyslexia is vitally important for educationalists and clinicians for the purposes of effective intervention. (Naglieri, 1985), b Digit Span subtest from the Athena Test (Paraskevopoulos et al, 1999), c Reading fluency (Panteliadou & Antoniou, 2007), d Single word spelling (Mouzaki et al, 2007), e PPVT adapted for Greek (Simos et al, 2011).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…" (Naglieri, 1985b), b Digit Span subtest the from Athena Test (Paraskevopoulos et al, 1999), c Reading fluency (Panteliadou & Antoniou, 2007), d Single word spelling (Mouzaki et al, 2007), e PPVT adapted for Greek (Simos et al, 2011) Figure 1: Nonword reading accuracy by word reading latency for the TDR children, and 90% confidence intervals. Results for the dyslexic children are also plotted: stars represent dyslexic children with the profile of phonological dyslexia, diamonds represent dyslexic children with the profile of surface dyslexia and hourglass symbols represent dyslexic children with a mixed profile.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He spelled just two high frequency words correctly (μαμά/mama/(mother) and όχι/ohi/(no)). Mouzaki et al, (2007), h blending subtest, the Athena Test (Paraskevopoulos et al, 1999), i PPVT-adapted for Greek (Simos et al, 2011). Scores in bold are for assessments where standardized scores were not available and represent percent correct.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His ideas are strongly supported by results of studies focused on gender differential item functioning in intelligence tests, even in measuring the g-factor. Results of many studies confirmed that several intelligence tests contain items which exhibit gender DIF (e.g., Immekus & Maller, 2009;Brown & Rodgers, 2009;Simos et al, 2011). Some of these studies focused on the sources of gender DIF in item content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Differential item functioning analysis has been used in many studies related to intelligence testing. Maller (2000) analyzed DIF in deaf and hearing children and Simos et al (2011) in different ethnic groups in Greece. Several studies also confirmed that one of the sources of DIF can be found in language skills and language origin (Martiniello, 2009;Roomaney & Koch, 2013;Schaap, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%