Psychometric Analysis of a Scale to Assess Particularized Trust in Families and Community- And Congregation-Based Groups

Miller, Miles C.; Pope, Holly; Wolfer, Terry A.; Mann, Joshua R.; Hussey, James R.; Colabianchi, Natalie; McKeown, Robert E.

doi:10.1002/jcop.21675

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our CBPR-PTS could facilitate the translation of CBPR-related partnerships’ trust-facilitating processes to policy, practice, and health outcomes across diverse and local communities (Lucero, Wallerstein, et al, 2018). In particular, the CBPR-PTS would contribute to measuring partnership trust from the perspective of Latinx communities who often perceive historic mistrust (Costa & Anderson, 2011; M. C. Miller, 2012; Sandoval et al, 2012).…”

Section: Discussion and Implications For Practice Policy And/or Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CBPR systematically adapts empirically supported science through the active engagement of key stakeholders (Wallerstein & Duran, 2010) and can be used to mediate mistrust among underrepresented populations (Lucero & Wallerstein, 2013). A rich literature identifies numerous trust-building processes embedded in CBPR best practices (Lucero, 2013; Lucero, Wright, & Reese, 2018; Lucero & Wallerstein, 2013; M. C. Miller, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DHHS (2013) stated that despite the relevance of trust as a community engagement outcome, gaps remain in understanding how the influence of CBPR in fostering trust can be measured. Thus, comprehensive, valid, and reliable tools are needed that measure partnership trust from the perspective of those who perceive historic mistrust (Costa & Anderson, 2011;M. C. Miller, 2012; Sandoval et al, 2012), as well as from a multidimensional, rather than a binary (i.e., whether a person trusts someone), perspective (Dietz & Den Hartog, 2006; Egede & Ellis, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lucero (Lucero, 2013; Lucero & Wallerstein, 2013; Lucero, Wright, & Reese, 2018) and M. C. Miller (2012) advanced the understanding of partnership trust in the context of CBPR qualitatively, and their findings represent a basis for our study.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Contribution to Measure Partnership Trust in Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions With Latinx Communities in the United States

Peralta

Rosas

Smithwick

et al. 2021

Health Promotion Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the growing diversity in the United States, responsiveness to the needs of diverse communities is paramount. Latinx communities in the United States often state mistrust in outside institutions because of adverse experiences. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is considered a trust-building process and is one approach to understand disparities. However, the conceptualization and evaluation of trust as a CBPR outcome are understudied. This article summarizes a community-engaged research process conducted for the cultural and linguistic refinement of a partnership trust survey tool to assess partnership trust as an outcome of CBPR (CBPR-PTS), by using Perinatal Awareness for Successful Outcomes (PASOs) as a case study and cross-cultural cognitive interviewing (CCCI) methodology. The participants were 21 diverse stakeholders of PASOs, a community-based health organization that serves the Latinx population in South Carolina. A modified version of the multidimensional measure of trust model informed instrument development. The team analyzed the CCCI data using compiling informal analysis to identify which survey items’ wordings must be changed or adapted based on the participants’ accounts. Sixteen of 28 questions subjected to CCCI required modifications due to translation errors, culturally specific errors, or general cognitive problems. The new survey instrument has 19 scales and 195 items categorized into nine dimensions of the modified multidimensional measure of trust model. CCCI was a useful tool to address the cross-cultural understanding issues of the CBPR-PTS. Measurement instruments should be able to capture the socioeconomic, cultural, and geographic/environmental variability of community stakeholders to help understand the diversity of the comprehension and views of the communities involved in disparities’ reduction efforts.

show abstract

Section: Discussion and Implications For Practice Policy And/or Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Contribution to Measure Partnership Trust in Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions With Latinx Communities in the United States

Peralta

Rosas

Smithwick

et al. 2021

Health Promotion Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This feeling of trust also extends to the safety of physical places, and the ability to feel comfortable in the spaces in which they live, work or play. This includes feeling that the community and organizations in the community are helpful, fair, and offer resources and supports when needed (Bian, Hao, & Li, 2018;Hudson, 2006;Jason, Stevens, & Light, 2016;Miller et al, 2015;Saint Onge, Jansen, & Ice, 2018).…”

Section: Socio-environmental Well-beingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Concept Mapping to Operationalize Mental Well‐Being for Men and Boys

McNeish

Walker

Massey

et al. 2020

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Psychometric Analysis of a Scale to Assess Social Participation of Chinese Adults

Zhou

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Social Participation Scale (SPS) is a 17-item questionnaire to assess the social participation of Chinese adults. It was developed using a multimethod approach applying in-depth interviews, qualitative analysis and quantitative psychometric evaluation for construct, convergent validity and internal reliability. In-depth interviews and an expert review panel suggested content validity. Exploratory factor analysis, Confirmation factor analysis, and intercorrelation between dimensions supported construct validity. The SPS was positively correlated with a prosocial tendencies measure and negatively associated with a material values scale, contributing to convergent validity. Internal reliability was also high. These results suggest that SPS has sufficient reliability and validity for use in future research investigating social participation in China and other countries with a few civil organizations.

show abstract

Psychometric Analysis of a Scale to Assess Particularized Trust in Families and Community- And Congregation-Based Groups

Abstract: The Relationships in Community Groups Trust Scale (RCG-TS) is an

Cited by 3 publications

References 42 publications

A Contribution to Measure Partnership Trust in Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions With Latinx Communities in the United States

A Contribution to Measure Partnership Trust in Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions With Latinx Communities in the United States

Using Concept Mapping to Operationalize Mental Well‐Being for Men and Boys

Psychometric Analysis of a Scale to Assess Social Participation of Chinese Adults

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About