2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological recovery after intensive care: Outcomes of a long-term quasi-experimental study of structured nurse-led follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains why it becomes so important to get a name to these illnesses; a diagnosis. Studies have also shown that critically ill patients may struggle with psychosocial and physical problems after being discharged from an intensive care unit and have a strong need for support during rehabilitation (43)(44)(45). These findings are in line with the current study, which unequivocally shows that, although the informants had a strong desire to be taken seriously over time, this was most often not the case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This explains why it becomes so important to get a name to these illnesses; a diagnosis. Studies have also shown that critically ill patients may struggle with psychosocial and physical problems after being discharged from an intensive care unit and have a strong need for support during rehabilitation (43)(44)(45). These findings are in line with the current study, which unequivocally shows that, although the informants had a strong desire to be taken seriously over time, this was most often not the case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Three studies, one RCT [ 628 ] and two observational studies [ 629 , 630 ] evaluated early post-hospital follow-up in patients with critical illness. None of the three studies specifically evaluated a sepsis population or reported the proportion of sepsis patients.…”
Section: Long-term Outcomes and Goals Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed the remaining 28 full-text articles to further evaluate their eligibility. We excluded 7 studies for which data were unavailable from the body or appendices, [52][53][54][55][56][57][58] six that had non-RCT designs, [59][60][61][62][63][64] eight in which interventions were not categorized as the ICU diary, [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and two were excluded for other reasons. 73,74 Therefore, we included five studies in our meta-analysis.…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%