Abstract:The psychological impact of the announcement of a fetal abnormality after ultrasound examinations is examined in relation to the building up of the mother-child attachment. It represents the "psychological cost" of such techniques. Understanding the subjective experience of the patients could increase the effectiveness of clinical practice. We have assumed that the relationship between parents and professionals is a critical element that contributes to the establishment of an emotional link between the mother … Show more
“…These researchers recommend further research into the area of bad news transmission using other research designs. Detraux et al 21 tabulated retrospective quantitative data from prenatal US diagnosis of fetal abnormality using a developmental psychology perspective. Rempel et al 22 explored the pregnancy decision-making processes of parents following an antenatal diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease using a qualitative design, describing parents' postdiagnosis relationship and interaction patterns with health care professionals.…”
Objective: Although prenatal ultrasound (US) is a common clinical undertaking today, little information is available about women's experience of the procedure from the perspective of women themselves. The objective of this study was to explore women's experience of undergoing a routine prenatal US examination associated with an unexpected fetal diagnosis.Study Design: Qualitative methods were used to explore the prenatal US experience of 13 women. Five women were given unexpected news of multiple pregnancy and eight women were given unexpected news of congenital fetal abnormality. One in-depth audio-taped interview was conducted with each woman. Content analysis of interview data identified themes common to women's experience of US.Results: Identified themes of women's experience of routine prenatal US examination associated with an unexpected fetal diagnosis are: experiencing the setting, sensing information, feeling connected/ disconnected, the power of the image, and communication rules.
Conclusions:Women's experience of prenatal US examination is influenced by physical and environmental factors and by the behaviors of the US examiner. Behaviors of the examiner contribute to a woman's labeling of the US experience as positive or negative. Women identify being objectified by the examination and experience poor communication patterns after a fetal US diagnosis. Women's description of the US screen image as a baby suggests it is a powerful influence on subsequent clinical and ethical decision-making about the pregnancy. Journal of Perinatology (2006Perinatology ( ) 26, 403-408. doi:10.1038 Keywords: prenatal care; sonography; maternal experience; antenatal diagnosis; fetal anomaly Introduction Although routine ultrasound examination (US) in low-risk pregnancy has not been proven to be advantageous in terms of perinatal mortality and morbidity, its use has become standard during pregnancy.1,2 Diagnoses resulting from prenatal US include multiple gestation, congenital fetal abnormalities, fetal growth problems and amniotic fluid or placental abnormalities. Study of US as a perinatal diagnostic tool has focused on whether US improves perinatal outcomes, 3-6 the psychological effect on women and men of such an examination, 7-9 perception and receipt of information, 10-14 and the experiences of staff who perform US examinations.15,16 A 1998 Cochrane review of routine US 17 focused only on physical outcomes, as did a later work.
18Reviewers of the work suggested a lack of research on women's experience of this type of procedure.
19Other researchers have focused on specific aspects of breaking bad news in perinatal situations and the sequelae of such an action. Alkazaleh et al.20 surveyed 117 women with pregnancy complications detected sonographically. Sixty-seven women responded to their survey of broad characteristics of bad news transmission, reporting what women found helpful after being given bad news. These researchers recommend further research into the area of bad news transmission using other research designs....
“…These researchers recommend further research into the area of bad news transmission using other research designs. Detraux et al 21 tabulated retrospective quantitative data from prenatal US diagnosis of fetal abnormality using a developmental psychology perspective. Rempel et al 22 explored the pregnancy decision-making processes of parents following an antenatal diagnosis of fetal congenital heart disease using a qualitative design, describing parents' postdiagnosis relationship and interaction patterns with health care professionals.…”
Objective: Although prenatal ultrasound (US) is a common clinical undertaking today, little information is available about women's experience of the procedure from the perspective of women themselves. The objective of this study was to explore women's experience of undergoing a routine prenatal US examination associated with an unexpected fetal diagnosis.Study Design: Qualitative methods were used to explore the prenatal US experience of 13 women. Five women were given unexpected news of multiple pregnancy and eight women were given unexpected news of congenital fetal abnormality. One in-depth audio-taped interview was conducted with each woman. Content analysis of interview data identified themes common to women's experience of US.Results: Identified themes of women's experience of routine prenatal US examination associated with an unexpected fetal diagnosis are: experiencing the setting, sensing information, feeling connected/ disconnected, the power of the image, and communication rules.
Conclusions:Women's experience of prenatal US examination is influenced by physical and environmental factors and by the behaviors of the US examiner. Behaviors of the examiner contribute to a woman's labeling of the US experience as positive or negative. Women identify being objectified by the examination and experience poor communication patterns after a fetal US diagnosis. Women's description of the US screen image as a baby suggests it is a powerful influence on subsequent clinical and ethical decision-making about the pregnancy. Journal of Perinatology (2006Perinatology ( ) 26, 403-408. doi:10.1038 Keywords: prenatal care; sonography; maternal experience; antenatal diagnosis; fetal anomaly Introduction Although routine ultrasound examination (US) in low-risk pregnancy has not been proven to be advantageous in terms of perinatal mortality and morbidity, its use has become standard during pregnancy.1,2 Diagnoses resulting from prenatal US include multiple gestation, congenital fetal abnormalities, fetal growth problems and amniotic fluid or placental abnormalities. Study of US as a perinatal diagnostic tool has focused on whether US improves perinatal outcomes, 3-6 the psychological effect on women and men of such an examination, 7-9 perception and receipt of information, 10-14 and the experiences of staff who perform US examinations.15,16 A 1998 Cochrane review of routine US 17 focused only on physical outcomes, as did a later work.
18Reviewers of the work suggested a lack of research on women's experience of this type of procedure.
19Other researchers have focused on specific aspects of breaking bad news in perinatal situations and the sequelae of such an action. Alkazaleh et al.20 surveyed 117 women with pregnancy complications detected sonographically. Sixty-seven women responded to their survey of broad characteristics of bad news transmission, reporting what women found helpful after being given bad news. These researchers recommend further research into the area of bad news transmission using other research designs....
“…Thus the patients were though anxious it did not affect their satisfaction. This could be related to the fact that most patient from the study indicated that they would not hesitate if asked to undergo the procedure again in contradiction with the study by Detraux et al [10]. The patients' satisfaction could be, the healthcare personnel, related to them in a friendly manner and also they found the imaging room to be comfortable.…”
Section: Effects Of Anxiety On Patient's Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…5) in support of Detraux et al, [10] and Christaine et al, [11] who stated that major reasons why women are anxious during and after an ultrasound examination is because of the fear of the outcome of the examination. Distressor anxiety is not determined by the invasiveness or pain of the procedure as argued by Kowaleek et al [12] which supports the findings of this study.…”
Section: Post Procedural Anxietymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Most of the patients were not anxious about the pain or discomfort they may go through but rather, are primarily concerned about their problems and outcomes (Christaine et al,) [11]. These findings contradicts a previous work by Detraux et al, [10] whose study found that transvaginal ultrasound cause and trigger anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms among these patients.…”
Abstract:Background: Anxiety is a feeling of tension associated with a sense of threat of danger when the source is unknown. Anxiety disorders are often associated with common age related medical and chronic conditions such asthma, thyroid disease, coronary artery disease, dementia and sensory loss. Most diagnostic medical imaging has been seen to be associated with some level of anxiety. Aim: The aim was to investigate and compare the anxiety levels of women undergoing ultrasound examination. Methods: A quantitative method with descriptive design was used for the study using closed-ended and few open-ended questionnaires with 100 participants. Data collected were analyzed using the Statistical and Packages for Social Sciences Version 20.0 and Microsoft excel. Result: The result showed that there was no difference between the pre and post procedural anxiety in the patient and one of the major causes of anxiety was lack pre-procedural information and fear of the outcomes of the examination being done. Conclusion: It was concluded that the patients feel anxious before and after an ultrasound examination.
“…Many studies have shown that the detection of an anomaly creates emotional disturbance for the mother and her partner. Various feelings such as anxiety, prostration, depression, and loneliness are generally found in such mothers 20 . In a group of 11 mothers who had a child with cardiopathy diagnosed before birth, Detraux et al 20 found that ultrasound examination appeared at first as a method to visualize the future child, and confront the anxiety-producing reality of fetal cardiopathy.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.