2003
DOI: 10.2190/5ynf-ylc3-8hw0-lq6j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological Evaluation of Waterside Space Using Audio-Visual Information

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of water sound on subjective impression, an experiment on the evaluation of the waterside space using audio-visual information was conducted. The interaction of audio-visual information and the relation between the physical characteristics of sound from water and the impression were examined. The experiment consisted of three conditions; only sound was presented in condition A, only visual image in condition V, and both sound and visual image in condition A+V. Impressions wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual masking by green plants seemed effective in reducing negative impression of road traffic noise (Kuwano et al, 2001). Morinaga, Aono, Kuwano, and Kato (2003) also found that perceived pleasantness of a virtual water space is more influenced by visual than auditory information, especially when audio and visual cues are perceived more differently (more ambiguous).…”
Section: External Assessment Perspectivementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Visual masking by green plants seemed effective in reducing negative impression of road traffic noise (Kuwano et al, 2001). Morinaga, Aono, Kuwano, and Kato (2003) also found that perceived pleasantness of a virtual water space is more influenced by visual than auditory information, especially when audio and visual cues are perceived more differently (more ambiguous).…”
Section: External Assessment Perspectivementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The effect was not found for emotional pictures, suggesting a more independent and lower order processing of facial expressions. Kuwano, & Kato, 2003Russell, 2002Schuurink et al, 2008Spangenberg, Sprott, Grohmann, & Tracy, 2006 In addition, negative items are more likely than positive items to bias a multisensory percept (Scherer & Larsen, 2011;Spreckelmeyer et al, 2006). It is suggested that fearful multisensory stimuli integrate more rapidly and automatically as they are regarded to be of more relevance to immediate survival than happy stimuli (de Gelder et al, 2005;Pourtois et al, 2005).…”
Section: External Assessment Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of subjects expressing unpleasantness (from 6 subjects for V2 down to 2 for V3) and no choice (from 22 subjects for V2 down to 13 for V3) was observed, as well as an increase of pleasantness (from 18 subjects for V2 up to 23 for V3) even with the percentile loudness N 5 measured for V3 higher than that observed in the V2 lay-out (Table 3). This might be due to the nature of falling water (a natural sound) that is masking the other sounds, confirming that water sounds are the best sounds to use for enhancing the urban soundscape 14 and their level should be similar to or not less than 3 dB below the level of the urban noises 15 . It has to be pointed out that the palm-tree and the fountain were rated the visual element in the scenarios attracting the most attention (Question 1 in Table 2) by 42% and 32% of subjects respectively.…”
Section: Piazza Vanvitellimentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The results have shown that visual images have a great impact on the impression perception of waterfront space. With the increase in underwater sound level, sound is often considered more unpleasant [66]. Additionally, sound frequency can indirectly affect the visual aesthetics.…”
Section: Effects Of National Park Soundscape On Visual Aestheticsmentioning
confidence: 99%