Psychological distress and mental health of Thai caregivers

Abstract

Background As the proportion of elderly people within a population increases there is an accompanying increase in the role of informal caregivers. Many studies on caregivers report negative health outcomes but very few have addressed positive aspects of caregiving. This study examines characteristics of Thai caregivers, the distribution of psychological distress and mental health among caregivers, and the association between caregiver status and psychological distress. Methods This report is based on an ongoing national cohort study of 60,569 Thai adults. Caregiving was common in the cohort, and in 2009 6.6% were full-time and 27.5% were part-time caregivers. Outcomes of the study were reported using an international standard Kessler 6 for psychological distress and a national Thai Mental Health Indicator. Determinants included age, sex, marital status, household income, work status and urban-rural residence. Frequency of social contacts was also included as explanatory variable. Results Among cohort members, 27.5% were part-time caregivers and 6.6% were full-time caregivers. Compared to non-caregivers, full-time caregivers tended to be older, to be married, more likely to be in the lowest household income group, to be unpaid family members, and to reside in rural areas. We noted the seeming contradiction that when compared to non-caregivers, the caregivers reported higher psychological distress but higher positive mental health (i.e., self-esteem and content with life), higher positive mental capacity (i.e., coping with crises), and higher positive mental quality (i.e., helping others). After adjusting for possible covariates, part-time and full-time caregivers were more likely to report high psychological distress (Adjusted Odds Ratios, AOR 1.33 and 1.78 among males and 1.32 and 1.45 among females). Less contact with colleagues was associated with high psychological distress both in males and females (AOR 1.36 and 1.33). Less contact with friends was also associated with high psychological distress, especially among females (AOR 1.27 and 1.42). Conclusions This study highlights caregivers in Thailand, the strong possibility of mental health benefits, some risks of associated psychological distress, and the positive role of keeping social contacts. Early identification of vulnerable caregivers is required to target effective health promotion.

Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home

“…was directly affected by their perception of social support, self-esteem and burden. Another study including caregivers to older people in general showed that less contact with colleagues and friends was associated with high psychological distress suggesting that it is important to keep social contacts (Yiengprugsawan et al, 2012). For health care and social services, this indicates the need to identify vulnerable caregivers in order to be able to provide them with support, such as respite care or day care for the person cared for (in our case the PwD) and encourage families to support each other and share the caregiver responsibility.…”

Needs of the caregivers of people requiring palliative care in an urban area of Pondicherry, South India

“…Study by Yiengprugsawan et al among Thai caregivers identified high level of psychological stress among female caregivers with high work burden, because of managing the patient and other household activities similar to the present study. 10 In contrast to this, study by Gupta et al among caregivers of psychiatric and cancer patients in India showed equal level of stress among male and female caregivers.…”

Mediating Roles of Resilience and Optimism between Work Demand and Psychological Distress among Pre-School Pupils’ Caregivers

“…Caregivers reported higher psychological distress but higher positive mental health (i.e., self-esteem and content with life), higher positive mental capacity (i.e., coping with crises), and higher positive mental quality (i.e., helping others) [17]. Objective health has an indirect effect on psychological distress, in size comparable to the effect exerted by functional status and subjective health [18].…”