2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781410600363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychological Assessment With the MMPI-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these results, we withdraw attention to the association between less consciousness, impulsivity, and lack of affability, on the one hand, and several unfavourable indicators of performance, interpersonal diffi culties, and behaviour problems, on the other (Caspi & Shiner, 2006;Poropat, 2009;Singh & Waldman, 2010;van Aken & Dubas, 2004;Zuckerman & Kuhlman, 2000). Although most of these studies refer to Big Five personality traits, we can consider them related to PSY dimensions, since they involve similar behaviours and characteristics (Friedman, Lewak, Nichols, & Webb, 2001). Therefore we considered the following specifi c hypotheses:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these results, we withdraw attention to the association between less consciousness, impulsivity, and lack of affability, on the one hand, and several unfavourable indicators of performance, interpersonal diffi culties, and behaviour problems, on the other (Caspi & Shiner, 2006;Poropat, 2009;Singh & Waldman, 2010;van Aken & Dubas, 2004;Zuckerman & Kuhlman, 2000). Although most of these studies refer to Big Five personality traits, we can consider them related to PSY dimensions, since they involve similar behaviours and characteristics (Friedman, Lewak, Nichols, & Webb, 2001). Therefore we considered the following specifi c hypotheses:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several textbooks offer instruction on interpretation of the PSY-5-2 scores, including Butcher and Williams (2000), Friedman, Lewak, Nichols, and Webb (2001), and Graham (2012). Graham has offered a particularly detailed discussion of the scales with a chapter shared between the PSY-5 and the RC scales of the MMPI-2.…”
Section: Psy-5-rf Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is unusual for youths who are being evaluated for legal dispositional purposes (rather than for purposes of emergency mental health evaluation, competence to stand trial, or waiver to criminal court) to over-report psychological and behavioral problems (Lachar et al, 2006: Pinsoneault, 1996), it is nevertheless important to examine test profiles for possible dissimulation, exaggeration, or over-reporting of problems. Exaggerated or distorted over-reporting of problems may result from an effort to draw attention to current fear, emotional pain, or psychological distress (Friedman, Lewak, Nichols, & Webb, 2001), and it may reflect a person’s experiential style to “overreact and to be traumatized” (Greene, 2011, p. 78). The FB validity scale on the PIY consists of 42 items, 37 of which overlap with, and are distributed fairly evenly among the clinical subscales.…”
Section: Item Overlap On the Piymentioning
confidence: 99%