“…Further details of the interventions using the ‘Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) [ 14 ] are reported in S1 Table . Of the 104 reviews 40 were judged by two authors (PC and HF) as overall low risk of bias [ 7 , 11 , 12 , 20 , 21 , 25 – 27 , 30 , 35 , 38 , 41 , 44 , 47 – 49 , 51 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 65 , 71 , 81 , 83 , 84 , 89 , 91 – 94 , 97 , 98 , 100 , 102 , 111 , 113 – 115 ]. Fig 3 summaries the risk of bias across all reviews.…”