2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychographic measures and sensory consumer tests: When emotional experience and feeling-based judgments account for preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preferences for softer car seat textiles observed in previous studies (Kergoat et al . 2010) could be characteristic of positive stimulation seeking.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Preferences for softer car seat textiles observed in previous studies (Kergoat et al . 2010) could be characteristic of positive stimulation seeking.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…This study was a first attempt to replicate previous findings highlighting AI as a predictive factor of soft textile preferences. More precisely, the hypothesis was that participants who like soft textiles, irrespective of the type of fabrics (car seat fabrics and washed‐shirt fabrics), would be characterized by higher scores on the IPA I factor, as had been observed in previous studies (Kergoat et al . 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, all the previous research analysed how to identify and measure emotions in the consumption process (Richins, 1997;King and Meiselman, 2010;Kergoat et al, 2010;Prescott, 2017;Spinelli, 2017), whereas the methodological approach in this study measured the effects of emotions directly aroused by the environment of the consumption on the willingness to pay for wine. In particular, this study observed that the emotions aroused by Mt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 42 However, an important challenge is to identify which consumer attributes (e.g., socio-43 demographics, habits, attitudes, etc. ), drive liking differences among consumers, beyond 44 varying preferences for the sensory attributes of a food product (Kergoat et al, 2010). This 45 information is crucial for product developers and marketers of new food products to improve 46 product properties, product communication, and marketing strategies.…”
Section: Introduction 34mentioning
confidence: 99%