Psychiatric Diagnoses and Psychiatric Treatment Among Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Sarwer, David B.; Cohn, Naomi; Gibbons, Lauren M.; Magee, Leanne; Crerand, Canice E.; Raper, Steven E.; Rosato, Ernest F.; Williams, Noel N.; Wadden, Thomas A.

doi:10.1381/0960892042386922

Cited by 222 publications

(153 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

136

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This scale has received considerable support in its validity and reliability, including adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability (36,37). The BSQ, BDI, and RSES are widely used measures of body image dissatisfaction and general psychosocial functioning in diverse clinical samples of obese patients (38)(39)(40)(41)(42), including bariatric surgery patients (43)(44)(45)(46)(47), and have been found to be associated with eating-related pathology within this latter group (25,26,48,49). The EOQ was included as an additional exploratory measure since eating (or overeating) in response to emotions is not uncommon for individuals who struggle with their eating behavior.…”

Section: Procedures and Assessment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Hrabosky¹,

White²,

Masheb³

et al. 2008

Obesity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective-Despite increasing use of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in bariatric surgery patients, little is known about the utility and psychometric performance of this self-report measure in this clinical group. The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate the factor structure and construct validity of the EDE-Q in a large series of bariatric surgery candidates.Methods and Procedures-Participants were 337 obese bariatric surgery candidates. Participants completed the EDE-Q and a battery of behavioral and psychological measures.Results-Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) produced a 12-item, 4-factor structure of the EDE-Q. The four factors, interpreted as Dietary Restraint, Eating Disturbance, Appearance Concerns, and Shape/Weight Overvaluation, were found to be internally consistent and converged with other relevant measures of psychopathology.Discussion-Factor analysis of the EDE-Q in bariatric surgery candidates did not replicate the original subscales but revealed an alternative factor structure. Future research must further evaluate the psychometric properties, including the factor structure, of the EDE-Q in this and other diverse populations and consider means of improving this measure's ability to best assess eatingrelated pathology in bariatric surgery patients.

show abstract

Section: Procedures and Assessment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Hrabosky¹,

White²,

Masheb³

et al. 2008

Obesity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…51 Patients selected for bariatric surgery often have a high prevalence of clinical depression. 18,148 However, evidence for an effect of bariatric surgery on depression is limited. Several longitudinal studies have explored the relationship between bariatric surgery and depression, identifying significant reductions in depression 149 and depressive symptoms 150,151 following surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery for obesity: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records

Gulliford

Charlton

Booth

et al. 2016

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

et al. Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery for obesity: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016;4(17). Health Services and Delivery ResearchISSN 2050-4349 (Print) ISSN 2050-4357 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Services and Delivery Research journalReports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research. It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation. The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.For more information about the HS&DR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HS&DR programme or one of its preceding programmes as project number 12/5005/12. The contractual start date was in October 2013. The final report began editorial review in October 2015 and was accepted for publication in February 2016. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HS&DR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinion...

show abstract

“…Several studies have found that rates of lifetime and current psychiatric disorders are substantial among candidates for bariatric surgery (1,2). Studies employing structured clinical interviews have revealed high lifetime rates of mood disorders (range: 22.0 -54.8%) and anxiety disorders (range: 15.5 -37.5%) prior to surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychiatric Disorders and weight Change in a Prospective Study of Bariatric Surgery Patients: A 3-Year Follow-Up

Kalarchian

King

Devlin

et al. 2015

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychiatric Diagnoses and Psychiatric Treatment Among Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Cited by 222 publications

References 34 publications

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Psychometric Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery for obesity: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records

Psychiatric Disorders and weight Change in a Prospective Study of Bariatric Surgery Patients: A 3-Year Follow-Up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About