2016
DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery for obesity: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records

Abstract: et al. Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery for obesity: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016;4(17). Health Services and Delivery ResearchISSN 2050-4349 (Print) ISSN 2050-4357 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view onl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent analysis about 40% of bariatric surgery operations in the UK were privately funded. 31 Thus, the intervention group might have a higher socioeconomic status than the non-exposed group, in which similar patients would not be able to afford surgery. Since the socioeconomic background is an important determinant of health outcomes and was an unmeasured potential confounder not considered in the matching process, this could have led to more positive health outcomes in the intervention group irrespective of surgery and to an overestimation of the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent analysis about 40% of bariatric surgery operations in the UK were privately funded. 31 Thus, the intervention group might have a higher socioeconomic status than the non-exposed group, in which similar patients would not be able to afford surgery. Since the socioeconomic background is an important determinant of health outcomes and was an unmeasured potential confounder not considered in the matching process, this could have led to more positive health outcomes in the intervention group irrespective of surgery and to an overestimation of the effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately for M, the UK lags far behind most advanced countries in the provision of 'metabolic surgery' 116 and she will probably face many barriers to accessing this highly successful treatment. 117 The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recently published a quality standard for the clinical assessment and management of obesity, 118 which includes the explicit recognition of the important role that bariatric surgery plays. It is to be hoped that this will lead to a marked change in behaviour of health commissioners and providers, so that this highly cost-effective form of care can be delivered to patients such as M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends coverage of bariatric surgery for patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) and those with severe obesity (BMI 35-39.9 kg/m 2 ) who have at least one comorbidity. To examine whether it would be cost-effective to extend coverage to patients with severe obesity and no comorbidity, EHR data were used to test the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for this group using literature-based and EHR-derived intervention effects [3,12]. EHR data allows for modeling of costs and outcomes for a population that would otherwise not have had access to the intervention by using the incidence, prevalence, mortality and health care utilization found in the longitudinal patient records [3].…”
Section: Advantages Of Electronic Health Records For Economic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%