“…The primary purpose of 31% (n = 19) of review articles was to describe the characteristics of patients evacuated from a deployed setting. 7 , 19–35 Studies revealed that typically young, male, Army enlisted, 7 , 24 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 first-time deployers 29 described most psychiatric AE patients, who were most often categorized by patient movement precedent code of Routine 20 , 28 (vs. Priority or Urgent) AEs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common AE diagnoses included adjustment disorder, depression, anxiety, personality disorder, and PTSD. 7 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 29 , 35 Despite more males were transported out of theater, there was an overrepresentation of females and ethnic minorities. 36 Suicide-related events were common 20 , 21 , 23 and individuals evacuated for mental health diagnoses were four times more likely to be discharged or separated upon returning home, as compared to medical AE patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers address the need for education and training, standard guidelines, and protocols for managing mental health patients in deployed and transport environments in 11 articles (18%). 19 , 23 , 27 , 43 , 45 , 49–54 These studies found or suggested that guidelines and protocols decrease safety issues and adverse outcomes 19 , 23 , 24 , 45 , 50 , 54 , 55 and that specific practice models and clear roles for deployed mental health staff potentially contribute to improved outcomes. 27 Study conclusions advocate for utilizing experienced mental health staff for emergency management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of nine articles included content related to mental health management in deployed settings. 19 , 27 , 53 , 61–66 A review by Glass (1954) was retained, despite its age, due to the extraordinary relevance and timelessness of the contents, which recounts the evolution of frontline psychiatry and novel strategies to prevent massive mental health evacuations through combat operational stress treatment principles of: brevity, immediacy, centrality, expectancy, and proximity (BICEP), a mainstay of current in-theater management. 61 Similarly, a recent exhaustive three-part review by Russell and Figley (2017) discussed the role of deployed mental health providers, as a primary administrative function, returning as many patients to duty as possible to prevent mission degradation; the Command approving only the most severe patients for psychiatric evacuation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 63 Several authors advocated for embedded mental health staff, 66 specific practice models and inpatient consultations, 27 potential benefits of deploying psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, 27 the concept of stabilizing mental health patients for 3-7 days before transport, 7 and standardized operational CPG definitions to decrease variance in diagnostic criteria. 19 …”
Background
Although combat stress and psychiatric casualties of war have consistently contributed to the need for deployed patient transport to higher echelons of care, little is known regarding specific evidence-based strategies for providing psychological support and optimal transport interventions for warriors.
Study Objective
The purpose of this scoping review is to map existing literature related to considerations for deployed mental health patient transport. The review’s primary aims are to identify the existing scientific research evidence, determine research and training gaps, and recommend critical areas for future military research.
Methods
We used Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage scoping review methodological framework (identify the research question, identify relevant studies, select studies, chart data, report results, and consultation). Using a systematic search strategy, we evaluated peer-reviewed literature from five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Embase) and gray literature from the Defense Technical Information Center. All publications were independently screened for eligibility by two researchers during three review rounds (title, abstract, and full text).
Results
We identified 1,384 publications, 61 of which met our inclusion criteria. Most publications and technical reports were level IV evidence and below, primarily retrospective cohort studies and epidemiologic surveillance reports. Few rigorously designed studies were identified. Eight research themes and a variety of research and critical training gaps were derived from the reviewed literature. Themes included (1) characterizing mental health patients aeromedically evacuated from theater; (2) in-flight sedation medications; (3) need for aeromedical evacuation (AE) in-theater education, training, and guidelines for staff; (4) epidemiological surveillance of AE from theater; (5) mental health management in deployed settings; (6) suicide-related event management; (7) transport issues for mental health patients; and (8) psychological stressors of AE. Research is needed to establish clinical practice guidelines for mental health condition management in theater and throughout the continuum of en route care.
“…The primary purpose of 31% (n = 19) of review articles was to describe the characteristics of patients evacuated from a deployed setting. 7 , 19–35 Studies revealed that typically young, male, Army enlisted, 7 , 24 , 29 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 first-time deployers 29 described most psychiatric AE patients, who were most often categorized by patient movement precedent code of Routine 20 , 28 (vs. Priority or Urgent) AEs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common AE diagnoses included adjustment disorder, depression, anxiety, personality disorder, and PTSD. 7 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 29 , 35 Despite more males were transported out of theater, there was an overrepresentation of females and ethnic minorities. 36 Suicide-related events were common 20 , 21 , 23 and individuals evacuated for mental health diagnoses were four times more likely to be discharged or separated upon returning home, as compared to medical AE patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers address the need for education and training, standard guidelines, and protocols for managing mental health patients in deployed and transport environments in 11 articles (18%). 19 , 23 , 27 , 43 , 45 , 49–54 These studies found or suggested that guidelines and protocols decrease safety issues and adverse outcomes 19 , 23 , 24 , 45 , 50 , 54 , 55 and that specific practice models and clear roles for deployed mental health staff potentially contribute to improved outcomes. 27 Study conclusions advocate for utilizing experienced mental health staff for emergency management.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of nine articles included content related to mental health management in deployed settings. 19 , 27 , 53 , 61–66 A review by Glass (1954) was retained, despite its age, due to the extraordinary relevance and timelessness of the contents, which recounts the evolution of frontline psychiatry and novel strategies to prevent massive mental health evacuations through combat operational stress treatment principles of: brevity, immediacy, centrality, expectancy, and proximity (BICEP), a mainstay of current in-theater management. 61 Similarly, a recent exhaustive three-part review by Russell and Figley (2017) discussed the role of deployed mental health providers, as a primary administrative function, returning as many patients to duty as possible to prevent mission degradation; the Command approving only the most severe patients for psychiatric evacuation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 63 Several authors advocated for embedded mental health staff, 66 specific practice models and inpatient consultations, 27 potential benefits of deploying psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, 27 the concept of stabilizing mental health patients for 3-7 days before transport, 7 and standardized operational CPG definitions to decrease variance in diagnostic criteria. 19 …”
Background
Although combat stress and psychiatric casualties of war have consistently contributed to the need for deployed patient transport to higher echelons of care, little is known regarding specific evidence-based strategies for providing psychological support and optimal transport interventions for warriors.
Study Objective
The purpose of this scoping review is to map existing literature related to considerations for deployed mental health patient transport. The review’s primary aims are to identify the existing scientific research evidence, determine research and training gaps, and recommend critical areas for future military research.
Methods
We used Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage scoping review methodological framework (identify the research question, identify relevant studies, select studies, chart data, report results, and consultation). Using a systematic search strategy, we evaluated peer-reviewed literature from five databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Embase) and gray literature from the Defense Technical Information Center. All publications were independently screened for eligibility by two researchers during three review rounds (title, abstract, and full text).
Results
We identified 1,384 publications, 61 of which met our inclusion criteria. Most publications and technical reports were level IV evidence and below, primarily retrospective cohort studies and epidemiologic surveillance reports. Few rigorously designed studies were identified. Eight research themes and a variety of research and critical training gaps were derived from the reviewed literature. Themes included (1) characterizing mental health patients aeromedically evacuated from theater; (2) in-flight sedation medications; (3) need for aeromedical evacuation (AE) in-theater education, training, and guidelines for staff; (4) epidemiological surveillance of AE from theater; (5) mental health management in deployed settings; (6) suicide-related event management; (7) transport issues for mental health patients; and (8) psychological stressors of AE. Research is needed to establish clinical practice guidelines for mental health condition management in theater and throughout the continuum of en route care.
Las alteraciones en salud mental son una grave consecuencia entre la población militar desplegada en operaciones militares. El presente estudio desarrolla una revisión sistemática de la literatura utilizando la metodología Prisma para analizar esta variable. Los resultados indican que la mayoría de los estudios se han desarrollado en población militar desplegada en los conflictos de Irak y Afganistán, con una mayor participación de tropas estadounidenses, y evidencian principalmente trastorno de estrés postraumático, depresión, abuso de sustancias y alteraciones del sueño, entre otras. Aunque los estudios no presentan diferencias significativas en sus hallazgos, es importante considerar la multiplicidad de variables que influyen en el desarrollo de alteraciones en salud mental en la población militar desplegada en operaciones militares.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.