2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32512-0_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudorandomness for Linear Length Branching Programs and Stack Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results hinge on the fact that "mixing" is well understood for regular ordered branching programs [9,36,28,14,45] and for (non-regular) width-2 ordered branching programs [5]. Indeed, understanding mixing underpins most results for restricted models of branching programs.…”
Section: Further Directions 71 Larger Widthmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results hinge on the fact that "mixing" is well understood for regular ordered branching programs [9,36,28,14,45] and for (non-regular) width-2 ordered branching programs [5]. Indeed, understanding mixing underpins most results for restricted models of branching programs.…”
Section: Further Directions 71 Larger Widthmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The classic result of Nisan [33] gave a generator stretching O(log 2 n) uniformly random bits to n bits that are pseudorandom against ordered branching programs of polynomial width. 1 Despite intensive study, this is the best known seed length for ordered branching programs even of width 3, but a variety of results have shown improvements for restricted classes of ordered branching programs such as width-2 programs [39,5], and "regular" or "permutation" ordered branching programs (of constant width) [9,10,28,14,45]. 2 For width 3, hitting set generators (a relaxation of pseudorandom generators) have been constructed [42,18].…”
Section: Pseudorandom Generators For Space-bounded Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations