2017
DOI: 10.4086/toc.2017.v013a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary version of this article appeared as extended abstracts [17,18] including only proof sketches, where our result was formulated for acceptance probability ε > 11/12. Since then a plenty of results on pseudorandom generators for restricted 1-branching programs [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] have been achieved which were motivated and/or follows our study referring to our result; see e.g. the paper [36] for a current survey of the newest achievements along this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A preliminary version of this article appeared as extended abstracts [17,18] including only proof sketches, where our result was formulated for acceptance probability ε > 11/12. Since then a plenty of results on pseudorandom generators for restricted 1-branching programs [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] have been achieved which were motivated and/or follows our study referring to our result; see e.g. the paper [36] for a current survey of the newest achievements along this direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…One thing to note about the above proof is that the coin theorem we used of [22] was suboptimal in the range ε = n −ω (1) , but still implied the optimal level 1 bound of [23]. Using Proposition 2.1, we can also improve the [22] coin theorem for small ε by setting ε 0 = 1/n in the following corollary:…”
Section: Definition 13 ([20]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…in 2014 to a corresponding level 1 Fourier bound for (non-necessarily monotone) constant-width read-once branching programs. Applying Corollary 2.3, we see that these latter results can in fact be derived (up to constant factors) using Steinberger's coin theorem as a black box.Corollary 2.4 ([22,23]). Let f : {−1, 1} n → {−1, 1} be computable by a width-w read-once branching program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even prior to Tal's work, the ℓ-Fourier weight of decision trees was studied for ℓ = 1 by O'Donnell and Servedio [17], who proved the tight O( √ d) bound and used it to give a polynomial-time learning algorithm for monotone decision trees. Fourier weight has been studied for various other classes of Boolean functions, including boundeddepth circuits, branching programs, low-degree polynomials over finite fields, and functions with bounded sensitivity; see the recent papers [12,20,21,10,9] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%