1995
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.001435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSA Screening: A Public Health Dilemma

Abstract: Screening for prostate cancer with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is one of the most controversial practices in health care today and guidelines from professional and policy organizations are contradictory. Prostate cancer is unique because of a wide discrepancy between prevalent asymptomatic cancer and clinical disease and an uncertain natural history. Proponents and critics of mass screening agree that PSA can detect early cancer and that definitive data that PSA reduces prostat cancer mortality are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 1992 and 1999 Group Health did not recommend PSA screening for asymptomatic men of any age, although PSA was a covered benefit. 33–35 In 1999 the guideline was changed to state that “a shared decision making process between provider and patient is recommended in counseling asymptomatic men regarding screening for prostate screening.” Following this change, PSA use in Group Health became similar to national patterns: 40% of men in Group Health in 2004 received a PSA test in the past 2 years; 36 and 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey reported that 42% of men aged 40 years received a PSA test in the past 2 years. 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1992 and 1999 Group Health did not recommend PSA screening for asymptomatic men of any age, although PSA was a covered benefit. 33–35 In 1999 the guideline was changed to state that “a shared decision making process between provider and patient is recommended in counseling asymptomatic men regarding screening for prostate screening.” Following this change, PSA use in Group Health became similar to national patterns: 40% of men in Group Health in 2004 received a PSA test in the past 2 years; 36 and 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey reported that 42% of men aged 40 years received a PSA test in the past 2 years. 37 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of pT1a/b and pT2 tumours which have the potency to develop biological aggressive potential is unknown. It is commonly believed that the fraction of clinical irrelevant tumours within the group of pT1a/b and pT2 tumours is relatively high [23]. Therefore we asked whether TRPV6 allele frequencies of extraprostatic and intra-prostatic tumours (at time of resection) are different or not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stark diVerences exist among organisations and among individual commentators regarding whether PSA screening should be recommended. 15 For the purposes of this paper, I examine only published individual decisions, leaving institutional decisionmaking for another time. There is no shortage of examples.…”
Section: Ontology Ethics and Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%