2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.12.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSA and new biomarkers within multivariate models to improve early detection of prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…ROC curve analysis has been criticized when it is used as the only tool to differentiate between 2 cohorts (28,29 ), and results can be misinterpreted (18 ). Our results, however, confirm reviewed data (8,22 ) that show a general advantage of %fPSA-based multivariate models for PCa detection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…ROC curve analysis has been criticized when it is used as the only tool to differentiate between 2 cohorts (28,29 ), and results can be misinterpreted (18 ). Our results, however, confirm reviewed data (8,22 ) that show a general advantage of %fPSA-based multivariate models for PCa detection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Multivariate models, such as artificial neural networks or logistic regression-based nomograms, improve PCa risk prediction by combining tPSA, %fPSA, age, digital rectal examination (DRE) results, and/or prostate volume (8,9 ). The frequent use of nomograms as PCa-classification models and for recurrence prediction has recently been reviewed (8,10 ).…”
Section: © 2011 American Association For Clinical Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can facilitate therapeutic planning for brachytherapy, cryotherapy, and minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia therapy ( 3-7 ). Prostate-specifi c antigen levels have been modifi ed to derive the prostate-specifi c antigen density by incorporating PV calculations to help guide clinical decisions ( 8,9 ). The clinical value of prostate-specifi c antigen density, however, is dependent on the quality of the PV estimate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, the sensitivity of screening was 57.1% and the specificity was 63.8%. The diagnostic rate reached 22.9% when coupled with biopsy by ultrasonic guidance, given f/t PSA ratios under 0.10 and PSA content in the range of 2.5-4.0 ng mL −1 [27,28]. In addition, PSA density and PSA volocity were other important potential references for prostate cancer diagnosis [29,30].…”
Section: No Current Test Can Replace Serum Psa For Mass Scree Ning Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%