1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.14600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity coupling in high-TcJosephson junctions produced by focused electron beam irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical current (µA) cm behavior is consistent with existing models of superconductor normal superconductor (SNS) junctions with soft boundary conditions [6,9].…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Critical current (µA) cm behavior is consistent with existing models of superconductor normal superconductor (SNS) junctions with soft boundary conditions [6,9].…”
Section: (A)supporting
confidence: 58%
“…1, we also show the dependence of the critical current on the external magnetic field from 21 K to 33 K; the crossover from a minimum to a maximum zero-field critical current between T=24.7 K and T=27.8 K is consistent with the T* value extrapolated by I-V characteristics and strong evidence that one of the two single junctions undergoes a 0-π phase transition close to T* [11]. 3 Bilayer SNS junctions The desirable feature of grain boundary junctions in HTS and their extension, junctions formed by electron-beam [12] and ion irradiation [13], is that junctions can be fabricated from deposited films with only a single lithographic process. We have developed processes which allow these features to be extended to low temperature superconductor (LTS).…”
Section: Hts Grain Boundary Devicessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…If we take the modal value of ∆ reported in the literature (5meV) [6][7][8][9] , I C R N for the MgB 2 junction is close to the direct prediction of de Gennes, 24 whereas for the YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7-d junctions it is much lower, implying strong gap suppression in the electrodes. 25 Direct calculation of ξ ND ( (hv f l / (4πkT c )) 0.5 ) is difficult given the uncertainty of the mean-free path (l), but using a value of 4.7x10 5 for the Fermi velocity (v f ) 2 , our value for ξ ND implies that l is of the order of 5nm. A value of 60nm for polycrystalline superconducting MgB 2 has been deduced previously, so this value does not seem unreasonable if the ion damage strongly reduces the carrier density in the barrier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%