Proximate sources of collective teacher efficacy

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -Recent scholarship has augmented Bandura's theory underlying efficacy formation by pointing to more proximate sources of efficacy information involved in forming collective teacher efficacy. These proximate sources of efficacy information theoretically shape a teacher's perception of the teaching context, operationalizing the difficulty of the teaching task that faces the school and the faculty's collective competence to be successful under specific conditions. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of three contextual variables: socioeconomic status, school level, and school structure on teacher perceptions of collective efficacy. Design/methodology/approach -School level data were collected from a cross-section of 79 schools in a Midwestern state. Data were analyzed at the school level using hierarchical multiple regression to determine the incremental variance in collective teacher efficacy beliefs attributed to contextual variables after accounting for the effect of prior academic performance. Findings -Results support the premise that contextual variables do add power to explanations of collective teacher efficacy over and above the effects of prior academic performance. Further, of the three contextual variables school structure independently accounted for the most variability in perceptions of collective teacher efficacy. Research limitations/implications -A sample of 79 schools was considered small to accurately test a hypothesized model of collective teacher efficacy formation using structural equation modeling. That approach would have had the advantage of permitting the researchers to identify the relationships among the predictor variables and between the predictors and the criterion. Additionally, there was a concern of possible aggregation bias associated with aggregating collective teacher efficacy scores to the school level. Despite these limitations, the findings hold theoretical and practical implications in that they defend the theoretical importance of contextual factors as efficacy sources. Furthermore, formalized and centralized conditions conducive to promoting perceptions of collective efficacy in teachers are identified. Origina...

Teacher Efficacy Research 1998–2009: Signs of Progress or Unfulfilled Promise?

“…Adams and Forsyth (2006) found that contextual factors like school structure, student SES, and grade level influenced the cognitive processing of teachers' perceptions of school-level collective efficacy. Bruce and Ross (2008) collected data from multiple sources (teacher observation, teacher self-report, and peer coaching summaries) to explore how the sources of teacher self-efficacy operated in a group of 12 elementary school teachers.…”

Classroom teachers’ efficacy in teaching healthy behaviour content

“…Teachers in the current study were under pressure to improve academic performance with their at-risk students at underperforming schools. Adams and Forsyth (2006) discussed that teachers may have the tools to teach, but it is the application of their tools in specific contexts that leads to effective teaching and student learning. Investigating collective teacher efficacy at the school level, Adams and Forsyth (2006) reported that the contextual variables of socioeconomic status, supportive school structures, and school level affected their collective teacher efficacy.…”

Caracterização das Pesquisas sobre Eficácia Coletiva Docente na Perspectiva da Teoria Social Cognitiva

“…Vale destacar que não se pode perder de vista fatores que devem ser considerados nesse contexto, como os aspectos sociodemográficos (Goddard, 2001), socioeconômicos (Parker, 2006;Tchannen-Moran & Barr, 2004), somados àqueles relacionados à infraestrutura, suporte pedagógico, questões sociais e políticas de cada escola (Adams &Forsyth, 2006;Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2007).…”