2015
DOI: 10.1111/evj.12486_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Suspensory Desmopathy in Hindlimbs: A Correlative Clinical, Ultrasonographic, Gross Post Mortem and Histological Study

Abstract: Summary Reasons for performing study It has been suggested that ultrasonography is unreliable for the detection of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmopathy (PSD) based on comparisons between ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images. Objectives To compare ultrasonography with gross and histopathological post mortem examination in horses with PSD diagnosed based on ultrasonography and control horses. Study design Retrospective descriptive study. Methods Part 1: 19 horses with hindlimb PSD and 10 control hor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Avulsion fracture at the origin of the suspensory ligament on the plantaroproximal aspect of the third metatarsal bone is usually associated with increased radiopharmaceutical uptake and is sometimes seen in association with focal suspensory ligament disruption or sometimes more extensive damage . A diagnosis of proximal suspensory desmopathy or an avulsion fracture can readily be made with ultrasonography …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avulsion fracture at the origin of the suspensory ligament on the plantaroproximal aspect of the third metatarsal bone is usually associated with increased radiopharmaceutical uptake and is sometimes seen in association with focal suspensory ligament disruption or sometimes more extensive damage . A diagnosis of proximal suspensory desmopathy or an avulsion fracture can readily be made with ultrasonography …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differentiation between radiographic and ultrasonographic findings of lame vs. clinically sound individuals presents a clinical challenge (Dyson ,; Labens et al . ; Dyson and Pinilla ). Furthermore, while evaluation of the proximal metacarpal or metatarsal region using radiography or nuclear scintigraphy may be useful in detection of bony changes, such as avulsion fractures, splint bone exostoses or cortical stress fractures (Brokken et al .…”
Section: Part I: Review Of Diagnostic Analgesia Of the Proximal Metatmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Radiography and ultrasonography may often be recommended first due to their widespread availability and relative affordability as diagnostic techniques. However, differentiation between radiographic and ultrasonographic findings of lame vs. clinically sound individuals presents a clinical challenge (Dyson 1991a,b;Labens et al 2010;Dyson and Pinilla 2015). Furthermore, while evaluation of the proximal metacarpal or metatarsal region using radiography or nuclear scintigraphy may be useful in detection of bony changes, such as avulsion fractures, splint bone exostoses or cortical stress fractures (Brokken et al 2007), MRI provides an advantage in distinguishing injuries arising from soft tissue as well as those with concurrent bony involvement (Labens et al 2010).…”
Section: Selection Of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities To Assess Clinicamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best design for a diagnostic imaging study aiming to compare a modality for its ability to diagnose a given clinical disease, such as MRI or ultrasound, to a pathologic process is a hypothesis driven, prospective study. Given that diagnostic imaging techniques usually aim to elucidate structural change, histopathology or surgery often serve as a gold standard and the diagnostic imaging modality under investigation can be interpreted in light of this gold standard . Major barriers to this approach can be the invasiveness of the gold standard and/or lack of access to adequate numbers of cases with the disease or injury being studied.…”
Section: The Gold Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%