2015
DOI: 10.4103/0975-3605.203706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal focal femoral deficiency: A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Type C patients have severe acetabular dysplasia, lack of femoral head, absence of femoroacetabular contact and severe femoral shortening. Type D, the most severe form of PFFD, is characterised by the lack of femoral head, acetabulum and any relationship between the residual femur and pelvis 7 8. Showing severe acetabular dysplasia, absence of the femoral head and severe femoral shortening, the phenotype of the case we currently present seems to fit the type C. However, different from the radiographic appearance of the type C PFFD in a small child, our patient radiographically showed no discontinuity of pelvis and femur.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Type C patients have severe acetabular dysplasia, lack of femoral head, absence of femoroacetabular contact and severe femoral shortening. Type D, the most severe form of PFFD, is characterised by the lack of femoral head, acetabulum and any relationship between the residual femur and pelvis 7 8. Showing severe acetabular dysplasia, absence of the femoral head and severe femoral shortening, the phenotype of the case we currently present seems to fit the type C. However, different from the radiographic appearance of the type C PFFD in a small child, our patient radiographically showed no discontinuity of pelvis and femur.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD) is a subset of a broader group called congenital femoral deficiency. PFFD is also known as congenital proximal femoral deficiency (CPFD) [1]. It is a rare congenital anomaly with an incidence of 1.1-2.0 in 100,000 live births [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%