2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal field Vis-NIR spectroscopy of soil organic carbon: A solution to clear obstacles related to vegetation and straw cover

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts to create samples with variable soil moisture content have also been made, though they are somewhat time consuming [73,80,143]. Additional factors that could interfere with in situ measurements are ambient conditions such as temperature, wind, and precipitation [144,145], soil roughness that could be altered by field operations, stones, plant residues and movement during spectral acquisition, i.e., vibrations [112,113,121]. Moreover, it should be noted that in-field measurements are usually performed in the top layer of the soil, with an exception being studies where the sensor penetrates the soil, which may impact the model's quality because laboratory reference measurements concern samples taken from a layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Attempts to create samples with variable soil moisture content have also been made, though they are somewhat time consuming [73,80,143]. Additional factors that could interfere with in situ measurements are ambient conditions such as temperature, wind, and precipitation [144,145], soil roughness that could be altered by field operations, stones, plant residues and movement during spectral acquisition, i.e., vibrations [112,113,121]. Moreover, it should be noted that in-field measurements are usually performed in the top layer of the soil, with an exception being studies where the sensor penetrates the soil, which may impact the model's quality because laboratory reference measurements concern samples taken from a layer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although bare soil conditions are the most favorable for in situ measurements, in real field conditions, the presence of either green vegetation or straw cover is very common, and may lead to overestimations of SOC [120]. Rodionov et al [121] aimed, in their study using the same spectra, to distinguish SOC from photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic vegetation. They conducted an experiment under laboratory conditions to estimate the effect of vegetation fractional cover.…”
Section: Photosynthetic and Nonphotosynthetic Vegetation Affecting Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding SOC, RF variable importance analysis of PSR+ 3500 full spectrum indicated that the regions of the most significant wavelengths were found mostly centered in the visible region. This probably occurs due to the effect that SOC have in the soil's color as a result of absorptions from chromophores, as the literature review reveals [5,65,66]. More specifically, it has been observed that the yellow and red colors of the soil are due to the presence of hematite and goethite [67].…”
Section: Reference Spectral Measurements Compared To the Mems Sensor Spectral Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, CAI can indicate presence of pre-crop residues (Aguilar et al 2012). The CAI was derived from Vis-NIR spectra as CAI = 0.5•(R 2025 + R 2215 ) − R 2110 from the sums of reflectance factors R at the wavebands 2000-2050 nm (R 2025 ), 2089-2130 nm (R 2110 ) and 2190-2240 nm (R 2215 ), respectively (Rodionov et al 2016).…”
Section: Calculation Of Cellulose Absorption Index (Cai)mentioning
confidence: 99%