2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2015.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provision, transport and deposition of debris in urban waterways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allen et al . () found that sediment moves through swales during subsequent runoff events by re‐suspension, conveyance, and re‐deposition. This has implications for longer‐term efficiency of these measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allen et al . () found that sediment moves through swales during subsequent runoff events by re‐suspension, conveyance, and re‐deposition. This has implications for longer‐term efficiency of these measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of a pollutant trap is evaluated based on the trapping efficiency which is defined as the proportion of the total mass of gross pollutants transported by the stormwater that is retained by the trap. The first gross pollutant traps were built in the late 1970s using simple designs and most recent technologies have developed high-tech design and construction [2]. Table 1 shows a few traps that have been developed in Malaysia, their advantages and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRAINS model includes a gully pit blockage factor taking account of the capacity reduction due to blockage by debris: it varies from 0 (fully open) to 1 (entirely blocked) [67,68]. Based on recommendations given in the DRAINS software manual, the blockage factor was assumed to be 0.2 for on-grade gully pits and 0.5 for sag pits.…”
Section: Pit Locations and Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%