2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing health checks as incentives to retain blood donors — Evidence from two field experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises the possibility of providing further health screening as part of standard blood donation procedure, as a way to engage older donors. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of cholesterol screening to increase donation rates, although not specifically with older donors [23]. Although as Zeiler et al [12] reported, committed older donors may be disappointed to be permanently deferred from blood donation, our findings suggest that older donors understand that their health may eventually preclude them from donating and are likely to accept when this happens, even if they are disappointed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…This raises the possibility of providing further health screening as part of standard blood donation procedure, as a way to engage older donors. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of cholesterol screening to increase donation rates, although not specifically with older donors [23]. Although as Zeiler et al [12] reported, committed older donors may be disappointed to be permanently deferred from blood donation, our findings suggest that older donors understand that their health may eventually preclude them from donating and are likely to accept when this happens, even if they are disappointed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Prior to publication, early theorizing and findings of this research on interventions to control food portions were shared at numerous academic talks and conferences with academics in the fields of nutrition, health, medicine, and agricultural and applied economics. Non-academic audiences Leipnitz, de Vries, Clement, and Mazar (2018), IJRM Exemplifies the value of sharing research ideas and preliminary findings with non-academic audiences while the research is still ongoing. Randomized field trials on blood health-check services for blood donors were used in extensive cooperation with the German Red Cross Blood Donation service to test different incentive strategies for blood donation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sales promotion: it was investigated the effectiveness of the donation promotion strategy, where the main idea is health testing (Leipnitz et al, 2018), donor examination as a tool for incentives (van Dongen et al, 2013), the implementation of loyalty programs for donor retention (Greffin et al, 2018), the effect of small gifts (Garbarino et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figure 1 Number Of Publications By Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015-2019: focus on donor retention and the use of modern marketing communication tools. Most of the articles are devoted to modern marketing tools in the service of blood ( Figure 5): Internet media (Aravindakshan et al, 2015), mobile applications (Yuan et al, 2016), interpersonal communications (Abril, 2016), motivational interview (France et al, 2017), e-mail (Bachegowda et al, 2017), Donor Day (Kranenburg et al, 2017), social networks (Sumnig et al, 2018), radio (Sumnig et al, 2018), mobile melodies (Appiah et al, 2018), motivational interview (France and France, 2018), WhatsApp (Rodrigues et al, 2019), text messages (Gemelli, 2018;Moussaoui et al, 2019), loyalty programs (Greffin, 2018), tools for attracting new donors (Senaldi, 2019) and retaining existing ones (Leipnitz et al, 2018;Hashemi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Figure 1 Number Of Publications By Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%