IEEE GLOBECOM 2007-2007 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2007.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing Congestion Control in the Iub Transport Network for HSDPA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this regard, best practices for backhaul design has been recently issued by NGMN Alliance [7] and there is an increasing number of solutions that can be adopted from different vendors to optimize the backhaul network [8]. As well, flow control mechanisms have been introduced in current mobile networks between BSs and radio controllers to partially mitigate traffic peaks in the backhaul links at the expenses of an increased delay in some services [9], [10]. Attending to previous considerations, the probability of facing a situation where the backhaul capacity of a given cell site becomes the bottleneck should not be underestimated [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this regard, best practices for backhaul design has been recently issued by NGMN Alliance [7] and there is an increasing number of solutions that can be adopted from different vendors to optimize the backhaul network [8]. As well, flow control mechanisms have been introduced in current mobile networks between BSs and radio controllers to partially mitigate traffic peaks in the backhaul links at the expenses of an increased delay in some services [9], [10]. Attending to previous considerations, the probability of facing a situation where the backhaul capacity of a given cell site becomes the bottleneck should not be underestimated [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the rest of the system is left unchanged, RLC cannot efficiently resolve these congestion situations, because it was not prepared for congestion control, but only for radio link failures. As a consequence, a mechanism is needed to resolve potential TN congestion, because RLC is hiding it from TCP by considering it as radio link failure [3], [4]. Since RLC considers data loss and increasing delay as radio link failure, it simply resends packets suspected to be lost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common and mainstream solution is to apply a system-specific flow control/congestion control below RLC in Iub Framing Protocol layer by extending the existing flow control introduced by 3GPP with congestion control functionality [4]. In this way i) TN congestion is resolved locally below RLC, ii) RLC handles radio link failures and iii) TCP resolves congestion on the non-3GPP part (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, best practices for efficient backhaul design have been recently issued by NGMN Alliance [5] and there is an increasing number of solutions pushing for the adoption of more cost-effective transmission technologies than those used in most current deployments [3]- [6] along with new resource management functionality specifically tailored to tackle backhaul congestion [7]. As a matter of fact, flow control mechanisms have been already introduced in current mobile networks to partially mitigate traffic peaks in the backhaul at the expenses of an increased delay in some services [8], [9]. Attending to previous considerations, cellular network capacity limitations due to a shortage of backhaul capacity should not be underestimated in some network deployments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%