2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-005-4633-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protoplast Fusion in Banana (Musa spp.): Comparison of Chemical (PEG: Polyethylene Glycol) and Electrical Procedure

Abstract: Optimization of protoplast fusion parameters is a prerequisite for the establishment of somatic fusion technology for banana breeding. In the present investigations, we compared the most frequently used fusion methods: the electrofusion technique and chemical procedure (polyethylene glycol). With regard to frequency of binary fusion, protoplast fusion with the fusogen polyethylene glycol was best. Conversely, electric fusion was found to be better with respect to mitotic activities, somatic embryogenesis and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the cell alignment experiment, most cells (Z95%) were attracted toward the edge of the microelectrode one by one and most cells were aligned as cell-cell twins. Compared with traditional electrofusion method [24,25], the probability of forming cell-cell twins is much higher (42-68%), which is essential for high fusion efficiency.…”
Section: Cell Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cell alignment experiment, most cells (Z95%) were attracted toward the edge of the microelectrode one by one and most cells were aligned as cell-cell twins. Compared with traditional electrofusion method [24,25], the probability of forming cell-cell twins is much higher (42-68%), which is essential for high fusion efficiency.…”
Section: Cell Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through nonconventional strategies, i.e. protoplast culture and fusion, mutagenesis, somaclonal variation and genetic transformation (Ganapathi et al, 2001;Matsumoto et al, 2002;Assani et al, 2005;Houllou-Kido et al, 2005;Kumar et al, 2005;Pei et al, 2005). In addition, the incorporation of biotechnological procedures in breeding programs depends upon effi cient and reliable plant regeneration protocols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7.1 Fusion of gentian protoplasts. a Embryogenic cell suspension of G. cruciata and (b) its "white" protoplasts, c shoot culture of G. tibetica and (d) "green" leaf mesophyll protoplasts, e "pearl chain" formation in AC electric field mixture of "white" and "green" protoplasts after DC pulse, f arrows indicate newly formed heterokaryons, g a single heterokaryon before and h after cytoplasmic mixing, i an increase in heterokaryon cell volume 1 week after fusion, j asymmetric heterokaryon division after 2 weeks in culture, k a multicellular hybrid aggregate after 3 weeks of culture, l granular embryogenic callus, m regenerating somatic embryo, n embryo conversion into plantlets, o acclimatized somatic hybrid plant Table 7.3 Combinations of species used in studies on gentian somatic hybridization and the results of particular protoplast fusions Chemical fusion can sometimes be more effective than electrofusion (Assani et al 2005). However, the frequency of heterokaryons obtained with the use of PEG for the same 3 gentian species combinations ranged from 2.42 % to only 3.65 % (Table 7. 3; Ładyżynski et al 2006).…”
Section: Conditions Of Protoplast Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%