1971
DOI: 10.1002/cber.19711040128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protonenresonanz‐Untersuchungen zur inneren Rotation, VIII. Konformationsanalyse α.α.o.o′‐tetrasubstituierter Toluole mittels magnetischer Kernresonanz und halbempirischer Energieberechnung

Abstract: Proton Magnetic Resonance Studies of Internal Rotation, VIII') Conformational Analysis of a.a.o.0'-tetrasubstituted Toluenes by Means of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Semi-empirical Energy CalculationsIH n.m.r. spectra and semi-empirical calculations of strain energies have shown that the ground state of the toluene derivative 3 is represented by conformation a (R -CH3), the cr-methine proton of which eclipses one of the o-methyl groups. Accordingly, the existence of two rotamers, e.g. 15E and 15Z, was demons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical mechanics calculations (3)(4)(5) agree with these measurements and strongly indicate a two-fold potential, the high energy form having the C-H bond of the side chain in a plane perpendicular to the benzene plane.…”
Section: A Ibsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Classical mechanics calculations (3)(4)(5) agree with these measurements and strongly indicate a two-fold potential, the high energy form having the C-H bond of the side chain in a plane perpendicular to the benzene plane.…”
Section: A Ibsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The chloro and methyl substituents are often (19) methyl groups cause (8) to be nearer 90" than do the two ortho chlorine atoms. There are some experiments, for example, on ortho disubstituted isopropyl benzene derivatives (19,20), that agree that a methyl has larger steric requirements than a chlorine substituent. Yet, a methyl group is a better n electron donor than a chlorine substituent, therefore possibly causing a larger 8 for the SCH3 group (compare 'J(C,C) for 4-methyl and 4-chlorothioanisole in Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The J method suffers from an oppoWhen X = CH,, the classical DNMR method and site disadvantage. As the bamer increases, the molecular mechanics calculations agree that the observed 6J becomes less sensitive to V,, particubamer is twofold (2) and much larger than in 1 (X = larly above about 3 kcallmol. H).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%