1984
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(84)90577-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton energy loss in solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Gd, the maximum SCS is found to be very high (Gd ~ 48  10 -15 eV cm 2 /atom), while the position of the stopping maximum is rather low (Emax ~ 80 keV). At higher energies, the RBS data coincide with data from literature [33,34,35,36]. The bold solid line is a fit using the semiempirical model described in [27].…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…For Gd, the maximum SCS is found to be very high (Gd ~ 48  10 -15 eV cm 2 /atom), while the position of the stopping maximum is rather low (Emax ~ 80 keV). At higher energies, the RBS data coincide with data from literature [33,34,35,36]. The bold solid line is a fit using the semiempirical model described in [27].…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…It looks surprising at a first glance that, in contrast with the predicted increase of the yield compared to the singlescattering spectrum [27,28], this partial spectrum shows the inverse ordering due to multiple scattering. This is, however, natural because in this partial spectrum we do not consider the compensation of the transport out of the internal cone by the counter-transport from the external region.…”
Section: Program Tests and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this figure, it is still possible to observe that this procedure was able to obtain stopping power values around the maximum stopping, and it is found to be very high (SCS max,Gd ∼ 48 × 10 −15 eV cm 2 /atoms), with a position of the maximum at E max ∼ 80 keV. At higher energies the RBS data coincide with data from literature [163,154,164,165]. The thick solid line is a fit using the model described in Sec.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Besides, at low energies, the screening potential must be considered. However, Sirotonin et al through a series of publications between 1970 and 1980 [151,152,153,154], measured the energy losses of protons and alpha particles in several elemental materials adopting directly Eq. 4.1, and making only few adjusts and normalizations to rule out some sources of uncertainties, they found final results with a relatively good uncertainty averaged on ∼ 10 % 3 .…”
Section: Energy Loss Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%