2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton elastic scattering differential cross-sections for 12C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the 12 C(p,γ) 13 N reaction is critical to understanding stellar hydrogen burning in massive stars, initiating the CNO cycle. Fig.2 shows the "S-factor" for this reaction V , near the resonance at 461 keV (centre of mass frame), which is also observable in the elastic scattering 12 C(p,p) 12 C reaction channel at 440 keV (laboratory frame: see Fig.3 [40]). This S-factor is calculated using the AZURE code of Azuma et al [41].…”
Section: Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the 12 C(p,γ) 13 N reaction is critical to understanding stellar hydrogen burning in massive stars, initiating the CNO cycle. Fig.2 shows the "S-factor" for this reaction V , near the resonance at 461 keV (centre of mass frame), which is also observable in the elastic scattering 12 C(p,p) 12 C reaction channel at 440 keV (laboratory frame: see Fig.3 [40]). This S-factor is calculated using the AZURE code of Azuma et al [41].…”
Section: Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We will discuss this exceptional precision below ( §5.4). [40]). Note that the S-factor is significant right down to zero energy.…”
Section: Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of green earth in Roman F I G U R E 5 Correlation between Cu and Si concentrations in the analysed fragments. The differently coloured data point corresponds to the different hues of the pigments (see Table 2) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] 7.32 (9) 0.062 (5) 0.0274 161.175 154.20 40.187 7Sample 40 White 8.64 (15) 0.169 (15) 14.08 (19) 0.064 (4) 0.0267 151.382 91.490 (8) 0.0130 138.3 (4) Green/blue 11.01 161.029 (28) 10.74 (12) 0.087 (6) 0.0389 226.50 (10) 0.0244 (20) 0.0132 (11) 0.086 (6) Red 5.30 (11) 0.272 (17) 15.62 (21) 0.117 (6) 0.0613 245.406 210.0087 (9) 0.0163 (12) 0.866 (12) 0.187 7Brown 2.32 (9) 0.175 (21) 19.9 (3) 0.093 (8) 9.89 (14) 0.0087 (12) 0.0218 (17) 0.144 (9) Green 3.83 (10) 0.112 (16) 17.44 (27) 0.044 (5) 0.0292 (19) 5.12 70.0149 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, benchmarking results have usually been reported, related to the validity of specific experimentally determined differential cross-section datasets [e.g. [3][4][5]. However, such measurements have never been performed in a systematic and consistent way, taking into account all the fine steps and details of the benchmarking process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%