2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for a scoping review on nursing care and the autonomy of disabled persons

Abstract: IntroductionConsidering the limitations that disabled persons experience, our understanding of caring for these people has evolved over time worldwide. Because nursing care is dependent on the choices made by patients, nurses can play an emancipatory role by empowering patients with disabilities to become the primary agent in their rehabilitation. Objective was to conduct a range analysis protocol proposing the mapping of conceptual elements for a nursing care model based on the autonomy of disabled persons.Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, it was not possible to observe the mean time of onset of PU due to its retrospective and documentary nature, since PU was mostly not notified when they appeared as stage I and showed in the medical record for the first time as a more advanced stage 1, 3,[15][16] . Category I is difficult to identify, perhaps due to the fact that it has no effective lesions, only an unbleachable erythema and because of this underreporting of this phase of PU is so frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the present study, it was not possible to observe the mean time of onset of PU due to its retrospective and documentary nature, since PU was mostly not notified when they appeared as stage I and showed in the medical record for the first time as a more advanced stage 1, 3,[15][16] . Category I is difficult to identify, perhaps due to the fact that it has no effective lesions, only an unbleachable erythema and because of this underreporting of this phase of PU is so frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, multi-morbidity was inextricably linked to death and disability in older adults [ 29 ]. Further, physical frailty and loss of independence can complicate the care for chronically ill patients and lead to poor prognosis [ 30 ]. Our findings suggested that for older patients with chronic diseases, the inability to live independently increased the risk of death, which was consistent with the reports from North America and Europe [ 10 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method allows examining the extent and nature of scientific production or clarifying concepts that underlie a given area, identifying the feasibility or relevance of systematic reviews and, in this case, it works as a step prior to the systematic review that analyzes the review question, systematize and disseminate findings contributing to practice, policymaking, and research, identify gaps in the literature, and to reveal how studies from a given field of knowledge have been designed. [10,11] The study was conducted between October and November 2020, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, a guide for the reporting of scoping reviews. [12] The PRISMA-ScR consists of 22 items divided into chapters: Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Funding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%