2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02703022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proterozoic intracontinental basin: The Vindhyan example

Abstract: TST-alluvial fan-fan delta-shelf (Deoland and Arangi Formations) • HST-carbonate ramp (Kajrahat Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1.5-1.4 Ga (Kumar et al, 2001), and a whole-rock Pb-Pb age of 1.65 ± 0.089 Ga from the uppermost phosphatic Tirohan Dolomite (Bengtson et al, 2009). While these dates broadly support correlation between the Tirohan Dolomite of the Chitrakoot Formation and the Rohtas Limestone of the Semri Group (Bengtson et al, 2017), robust stratigraphic correlations between the Chitrakoot outlier and principal Vindhyan sections in the Son Valley are complicated by inconclusive chemostratigraphic signatures (Ray et al, 2003) and significant lithological and thickness differences between these successions (Chakraborty, 2006 …”
Section: Age Of the Chitrakoot Taxamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1.5-1.4 Ga (Kumar et al, 2001), and a whole-rock Pb-Pb age of 1.65 ± 0.089 Ga from the uppermost phosphatic Tirohan Dolomite (Bengtson et al, 2009). While these dates broadly support correlation between the Tirohan Dolomite of the Chitrakoot Formation and the Rohtas Limestone of the Semri Group (Bengtson et al, 2017), robust stratigraphic correlations between the Chitrakoot outlier and principal Vindhyan sections in the Son Valley are complicated by inconclusive chemostratigraphic signatures (Ray et al, 2003) and significant lithological and thickness differences between these successions (Chakraborty, 2006 …”
Section: Age Of the Chitrakoot Taxamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Archean and Paleoproterozoic basement is covered widely by strata of the Vindhyan Supergroup, occurring in parts of the Central Indian Shield with a maximum thickness of about 4500 m (Ahmad 1958;Chakraborty and Bhattacharyya 1996). The Vindhyan Supergroup was deposited after the stabilization of the Aravalli-Bundelkhand (also known as Bhandara) craton around the time of completion of felsic magmatism at about 2.2 Ga (Chakraborty 2006). These sediments are unmetamorphosed and nearly Fig.…”
Section: The Age Of the Dhala Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Vindhyan Supergroup has been subdivided into Lower (Semri Formation) and Upper sequences (Kaimur, Rewa, and Bhander Formations) (Banerjee et al 2006;Chakraborty 2006). In general, the Semri Group (or pre-Kaimur Formation) comprises mostly marine sediments that include carbonates, siliciclastics, and volcaniclastics (Banerjee et al 2006).…”
Section: The Age Of the Dhala Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slides, folds, and thrusts presented in this paper provide clues for stress-induced extension and compression in the rifted Vindhyan basin during its post-rift evolution stage through the LL depositional history. This is, however, in contradiction to the traditional belief that the tectonic control on sedimentation essentially abound the lower part of Vindhyan sedimentation (Semri Formation); the upper Vindhyan evolved in an essentially tectonic quiescent sag mode (Chanda and Bhattacharya 1982;Chakraborty 2006). Considering the initiation of the Vindhyan basin on a rifted basement the evolution of the basin seems to be more complicated than the simple sag motif.…”
Section: Basin Tectonics and Role Of In-plane Horizontal Stressmentioning
confidence: 77%