The effect of drought and salinity stress on the seedlings of the somatic hybrid wheat cv. Shanrong No. 3 (SR3) and its parent bread wheat cv. Jinan 177 (JN177) was investigated using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Of a set of 93 (root) and 65 (leaf) differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), 34 (root) and six (leaf) DEPs were cultivar-specific. The remaining DEPs were salinity/drought stress-responsive but not cultivarspecific. Many of the DEPs were expressed under both drought and salinity stresses. The amounts of stressresponsive DEPs between SR3 and JN177 were almost equivalent, whereas only some of these DEPs were shared by the two cultivars. Overall, the number of salinity-responsive DEPs was greater than the number of drought-responsive DEPs. And most of the drought-responsive DEPs also responded to salinity. There are both similarities and differences in the responses of wheat to salinity and drought. A parallel transcriptomics analysis showed that the correlation between transcriptional and translational patterns of DEPs was poor. The enhanced drought/salinity tolerance of SR3 appears to be governed by a superior capacity for osmotic and ionic homeostasis, a more efficient removal of toxic by-products, and ultimately a better potential for growth recovery. Soil salinity and drought are the two most common abiotic stresses constraining crop growth and productivity (1). As a result, the development of improved levels of tolerance to these stresses has become an urgent priority for many crop breeding programs. In parallel, much research effort is being applied to gain a better understanding of the adaptive mechanisms used by plants to combat abiotic stress. High throughput genetic screening platforms have delivered substantial insights into these responses and have defined a number of the cellular and molecular processes involved in the response to abiotic stress (2, 3). The emerging picture is that of a complex gene network, centered largely on signal transduction.The current focus is now shifting from genomics to proteomics analysis because many gene products are subject to post-translation modification, which cannot be detected by transcriptomics analyses. A number of recent studies have attempted to describe changes to the proteome in response to salinity and/or drought stress (1, 4 -6). The primary effect of drought is to generate osmotic stress, whereas salinity induces osmotic stress more indirectly by its effect on the ionic homeostasis within the plant cell (7). Thus, it is unsurprising that there is an element of both commonality and distinctness in the response mechanisms to salinity and drought stresses. When Arabidopsis thaliana cell suspension cultures were exposed to either osmotic or salinity stress, it was possible to define a large number of responsive proteins (6). Similarly, a proteomics analysis of rice roots and leaves exposed to either salinity or drought stress led to the identification of several stress-responsive proteins (8). However, the global respons...