2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic analysis of porcine mesenteric lymph-nodes after Salmonella typhimurium infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(53 reference statements)
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UniProt Knowledgebase (KB) version used in this study contained only 1,406 manually curated, nonredundant (SwissProt) entries for Sus scrofa proteins, compared with 20,248 entries in the human and 65,102 in the mammalian databases (54). To overcome the paucity of fully annotated entries, MS data from porcine samples are often searched against either human plus pig or mammalian protein databases (6,35,56,70). An additional UniProtKB database, TrEMBL, contains protein sequences associated with computationally generated annotation but is not reviewed nor curated for redundancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UniProt Knowledgebase (KB) version used in this study contained only 1,406 manually curated, nonredundant (SwissProt) entries for Sus scrofa proteins, compared with 20,248 entries in the human and 65,102 in the mammalian databases (54). To overcome the paucity of fully annotated entries, MS data from porcine samples are often searched against either human plus pig or mammalian protein databases (6,35,56,70). An additional UniProtKB database, TrEMBL, contains protein sequences associated with computationally generated annotation but is not reviewed nor curated for redundancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, protein from individual replicates belonging to the same group was pooled (30 ug total), electrophoretically fractionated in 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Western blot assays were carried out as described by Martins et al [10] employing the following primary antibodies: 4B7/8 for swine histocompatibility class I antigen (SLAI) detection [19], 1 F12 for swine histocompatibility class II antigen (SLAII) detection [19], anti-CTLA4 (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA, USA) and anti-Clathrin light chain (ab24579, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). To confirm equal sample loading, membranes were reblotted with anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (GenScript, Picastaway, NJ, USA) and no statistical differences for GAPDH abundance were observed between groups in all assays.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm equal sample loading, membranes were reblotted with anti-GAPDH monoclonal antibody (GenScript, Picastaway, NJ, USA) and no statistical differences for GAPDH abundance were observed between groups in all assays. Membranes were scanned in an FLA-5100 imager (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and signal intensity was determined using Multigauge software (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [10]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations