1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(98)00828-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteins in solution:from X-ray scattering intensities to interaction potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
203
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
17
203
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion, by itself, is not new for it has been reached earlier by formulating numerical work incorporating short-range forces and screened electrostatics and comparing it with x-ray scattering 39,40 and liquid-liquid phase separation. [41][42][43] The merit of the current analysis is its transparency because it is analytical and it is based on a nonperturbative variational principle for general short-range potentials, so it may be readily generalized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This conclusion, by itself, is not new for it has been reached earlier by formulating numerical work incorporating short-range forces and screened electrostatics and comparing it with x-ray scattering 39,40 and liquid-liquid phase separation. [41][42][43] The merit of the current analysis is its transparency because it is analytical and it is based on a nonperturbative variational principle for general short-range potentials, so it may be readily generalized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The form factor was calculated (39)(40)(41) by averaging over all possible protein orientations by integrating over the angles and θ with and For the structure factor S(Q), either a mean spherical approximation accounting for electrostatic repulsions (42,43) or a square-well potential representing short-ranged attractions (44) was used, depending on the degree of protein neutralization by the surfactant (see below). The depth (∈′ ) 3.28k B T) and width (λ ) 1.033) of the square well were estimated from the van der Waals attractive potential (45) by equating the area in the "well" to that of the overall potential (van der Waals plus electrostatic) over the range of separation distances where the potential is attractive. The model fits were performed using the data analysis software and structure factors provided by NIST (triaxial form factor available from CTL upon request).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concretely, Lyklema justified this specific adsorption on changes in the configurational entropy of the water molecules adjacent to the solid surface after binding of the ion to the surface sites. Tardieu et al 44 also used the DLVO theory in protein crystallization studies, and they were obeyed to vary either the charge or the potential attraction to account the salt series. Our strategy aims in the same direction because DLVO interactions will be somehow modified by the presence of specific cations and anions.…”
Section: A Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%