2003
DOI: 10.1021/jp0363996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteins in Mixed Solvents:  A Molecular-Level Perspective

Abstract: Abstract-We present a statistical mechanical approach for quantifying thermodynamic properties of proteins in mixed solvents. This approach, based on molecular dynamics simulations which incorporate all atom models and the theory of preferential binding, allows us to compute transfer free energies with experimental accuracy and does not incorporate any adjustable parameters. Specifically, we applied our approach to the model proteins RNase A and T1, and the solvent components water, glycerol, and urea. We foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
272
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
272
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For longer repeats of the backbone model the preferential interaction parameter is usually negative indicating a significant decrease in the overall amount of TMAO as compared to bulk solution, but this depends on conformation and is quite noisy. The high relative error seen is common behavior for the preferential interaction parameter as evidenced by the calculations of others, [36][37][38] because the nature of the calculation depends upon the local number fluctuations at increasing distances. The inherent nosiness of the parameter, and the subsequent lack in statistical confidence of the interpretation, caused us to look at shorter ranged events that are less susceptible to artifacts caused by large local number fluctuations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For longer repeats of the backbone model the preferential interaction parameter is usually negative indicating a significant decrease in the overall amount of TMAO as compared to bulk solution, but this depends on conformation and is quite noisy. The high relative error seen is common behavior for the preferential interaction parameter as evidenced by the calculations of others, [36][37][38] because the nature of the calculation depends upon the local number fluctuations at increasing distances. The inherent nosiness of the parameter, and the subsequent lack in statistical confidence of the interpretation, caused us to look at shorter ranged events that are less susceptible to artifacts caused by large local number fluctuations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For our calculation of the preferential interaction parameter, we have chosen a local cutoff distance to be 8.0Å beyond which the correlations are no longer strong. 36 At this distance, we have included around three hydration layers of the peptide backbone, thus providing a satisfactory view of the overall hydration of the backbone. From Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach is to study cosolvent binding at low denaturant concentrations so as to avoid populating the denatured state. [28] In addition, the individual values of N 21 and N 23 can be extracted from the above expressions using the KB results for the partial molar volume (V ) of the solute at infinite dilution in terms of properties of the reference solution,…”
Section: Background and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] For protein systems, the effects of various salts and other small molecules, e.g., the "salting in" and "salting out" effects associated with the Hofmeister series, 9,22-26 have been documented in great detail, although a unifying theory that can quantitatively predict the effect of salt concentration on the stability of protein is not yet available. [27][28][29][30][31][32] The importance of salt on protein stability was also illustrated in several molecular dynamics simulations. 33,34 Although including counter ions for proteins with a low overall charge was shown not as important, 35 proteins with a higher overall charge are more sensitive to the ionic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%