2015
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2014090903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteinase 3-ANCA Vasculitis versus Myeloperoxidase-ANCA Vasculitis

Abstract: In patients with GN or vasculitis, ANCAs are directed against proteinase 3 (PR3) or myeloperoxidase (MPO). The differences between PR3-ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and MPO-AAV described in the past have been supplemented during the last decade. In this review, we discuss the differences between these two small-vessel vasculitides, focusing especially on possible etiologic and pathophysiologic differences. PR3-AAV is more common in northern parts of the world, whereas MPO-AAV is more common in southern regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
133
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(149 reference statements)
7
133
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…. The fact that different approaches were needed to demonstrate the pathogenic potential of MPO-ANCAs and PR3-ANCAs in these studies increased the awareness that instead of distinguishing between patients with GPA, MPA and EGPA, differentiating between patients with MPOANCAs or PR3-ANCAs might be more clinically relevant [34][35][36][37] . This notion was underscored in 2012 by the finding that these autoantibodies can be used to differentiate between genetically distinct subsets of patients with AAV 38 .…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The fact that different approaches were needed to demonstrate the pathogenic potential of MPO-ANCAs and PR3-ANCAs in these studies increased the awareness that instead of distinguishing between patients with GPA, MPA and EGPA, differentiating between patients with MPOANCAs or PR3-ANCAs might be more clinically relevant [34][35][36][37] . This notion was underscored in 2012 by the finding that these autoantibodies can be used to differentiate between genetically distinct subsets of patients with AAV 38 .…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional classification based on clinical phenotype has been challenged as there is now good epidemiological, genetic and clinical evidence to support a division based on ANCA subtype. 3 GPA, MPA and EGPA have respective annual incidence rates of 2.1-14.4, 2.4-10.1 and 0.5-3.7 per million in Europe, and the prevalence of AAV is estimated at to be 46-184 per million. 4 They are more common in those aged over 60 years and slightly more common in men.…”
Section: Classification and Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, no difference in the relapse risk between GPA and MPA was observed if patients were stratified according to their ANCA specificity. These findings, in addition to distinct genetic differences between PR3-ANCA-and MPO-ANCA-positive patients but less between patients with GPA and MPA [47], lead to the suggestion that patients should be classified based on ANCA specificity and not the disease entity [2,48,49]. Differences between PR3-ANCA and MPO-AAV have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [49].…”
Section: Patient Classifications -Based On the Chance To Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings, in addition to distinct genetic differences between PR3-ANCA-and MPO-ANCA-positive patients but less between patients with GPA and MPA [47], lead to the suggestion that patients should be classified based on ANCA specificity and not the disease entity [2,48,49]. Differences between PR3-ANCA and MPO-AAV have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [49]. The risk to develop a relapse is not only associated with clinical or serological phenotypes, differences in the genetic background may also play a role [43][44][45].…”
Section: Patient Classifications -Based On the Chance To Relapsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation