2003
DOI: 10.4141/a03-019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein turnover—what does it mean for animal production?

Abstract: Lobley, G. E. 2003. Protein turnover-what does it mean for animal production? Can. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 327-340. The dynamics of protein turnover confer great advantages for homeothermy, plasticity and metabolic function in mammals. The different roles played by the various organs have led to aspects of protein synthesis and degradation that aid the various functions performed. The so-called "non-productive" organs such as the gastro-intestinal tract and liver produce large quantities of export proteins that perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
67
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous dietrelated factors can influence N efficiency, such as overfeeding with rumen degradable protein (Hristov et al, 2004), lack of synchronisation between ruminal carbohydrate and protein degradation (Casper et al, 1999), unbalanced composition of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (Rulquin et al, 1993) and undersupply of -E-mail: nbk@agrsci.dk nutrients other than amino acids (Firkins et al, 2006). However, N efficiency is influenced by not only dietary factors but also the production level of the cow and the inevitable endogenous amino acid catabolism influences overall efficiency (Lobley, 2003). Ruminants have a competitive advantage compared with other species by having a digestive system that makes it possible to reutilise endogenous N. Data reviewed by Lapierre and Lobley (2001) showed that on average 43% of the endogenous urea production was taken up into the gastro-intestinal tract as estimated from the negative net portal flux of urea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous dietrelated factors can influence N efficiency, such as overfeeding with rumen degradable protein (Hristov et al, 2004), lack of synchronisation between ruminal carbohydrate and protein degradation (Casper et al, 1999), unbalanced composition of amino acids absorbed in the small intestine (Rulquin et al, 1993) and undersupply of -E-mail: nbk@agrsci.dk nutrients other than amino acids (Firkins et al, 2006). However, N efficiency is influenced by not only dietary factors but also the production level of the cow and the inevitable endogenous amino acid catabolism influences overall efficiency (Lobley, 2003). Ruminants have a competitive advantage compared with other species by having a digestive system that makes it possible to reutilise endogenous N. Data reviewed by Lapierre and Lobley (2001) showed that on average 43% of the endogenous urea production was taken up into the gastro-intestinal tract as estimated from the negative net portal flux of urea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hilderbrand et al, 1996;Zhao and Schell, 2004;Sponheimer et al, 2006). The quality and quantity of protein in a consumer's diet can affect the turnover rate of proteins, thereby altering carbon and nitrogen turnover rates (Lobley, 2003;Zhao et al, 2006). Isotopic turnover rates can also vary among tissue types, species, body sizes and nutritional states Newsome et al, 2010), making comparisons among studies difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alteration of the growth pattern during compensatory growth is due to significant modifications in both protein synthesis and protein breakdown (Bruce et al, 1991;Van Eenaeme et al, 1998;Hornick et al, 2000). The increase in protein anabolism efficiency during refeeding after food restriction, a highly beneficial adaptation of animals to undernutrition, requires a large amount of energy (Lobley, 2003) and stimulates the mitochondrial redox chain, which is one of the sources of ROS (Aurousseau, 2002;Drö ge, 2002;Griffiths, 2002). Such oxidation processes occurring during these adaptation periods, which happen simultaneously with alterations in the food supply, have not been studied in farm animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%