2013
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.093963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope turnover rates and diet-tissue discrimination in skin ofex situBottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Abstract: Diet-tissue discrimination factors (Δ 15 N or Δ 13 C) and turnover times are thought to be influenced by a wide range of variables including metabolic rate, age, dietary quality, tissue sampled and the taxon being investigated. In the present study, skin samples were collected from ex situ dolphins that had consumed diets of known isotopic composition for a minimum of 8 weeks. Adult dolphins consuming a diet of low fat (5-6%) and high δ 15 N value had significantly lower Δ C ranged from 11 to 23 days with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All samples were frozen until analysis. All tissues sampled have similar tissue turnover rates (or half-life), estimated to be 2-3 weeks for shearwaters (cellular component; Barquete et al, 2013), gull chicks (whole blood; Bearhop et al, 2002;Ogden et al, 2004), and whales (skin; Todd, 1997;Browning et al, 2014).…”
Section: Study Site and Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples were frozen until analysis. All tissues sampled have similar tissue turnover rates (or half-life), estimated to be 2-3 weeks for shearwaters (cellular component; Barquete et al, 2013), gull chicks (whole blood; Bearhop et al, 2002;Ogden et al, 2004), and whales (skin; Todd, 1997;Browning et al, 2014).…”
Section: Study Site and Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues are discussed by Rosel et al (2017) for genetic assignment, and Hohn et al (2017) for SIR. One concern, in particular, is that SIR data tell us where animals have been foraging over the past few weeks to months (Browning et al 2014, Giménez et al 2016, not necessarily from where they originated (Hohn et al 2017). For example, in 10 cases, animals that were assigned via genetics to the BSE population with high probability had stable isotope signatures more indicative of a coastal stock animal (see Table S1 in the Supplement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…δ (Caut et al 2009). These trophic discrimination factors (∆ values) are tissue-and species-specific, and are typically measured in controlled feeding studies (e.g., Hobson et al 1996, Browning et al 2014). …”
Section: Inferring Preymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies (Caut et al 2011, Browning et al 2014, Giménez et al 2016) have estimated trophic discrimination factors in cetaceans experimentally. We used values reported in Browning et al (Table 3), which we assumed would make up the largest proportion of protein assimilated by killer whales.…”
Section: Inferring Preymentioning
confidence: 99%