2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-019-01130-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein replenishment in pitcher fluids of Nepenthes × ventrata revealed by quantitative proteomics (SWATH-MS) informed by transcriptomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) already showed high expression levels on D0. This corroborates findings that most of the endogenous secreted proteins already present in pitcher fluids before opening with certain proteins continuously replenished or induced by prey 15,34,37,46 . In comparison, there was no clear trend in the expression of transporters on D0 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5) already showed high expression levels on D0. This corroborates findings that most of the endogenous secreted proteins already present in pitcher fluids before opening with certain proteins continuously replenished or induced by prey 15,34,37,46 . In comparison, there was no clear trend in the expression of transporters on D0 (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the transcriptomic analysis provides an alternative to studying the functional genomics of tropical pitcher plants. This reference transcriptome of N. ampullaria pitchers based on the previous RNA-seq experiment 38 is by far one of the most comprehensive reports comparable to N. mirabilis 16 , N. www.nature.com/scientificreports www.nature.com/scientificreports/ rafflesiana 15 , N. x ventrata 37,41 , and N. khasiana 6 . Only 5.3% single-copy orthologs were missing based on BUSCO analysis and 31.4% of 158,756 unigenes were functionally annotated, in which 76% were annotated to plants compared to 62% for N. rafflesiana 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations