2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein phosphorylation in Nicotiana tabacum cells in response to perception of lipopolysaccharides from Burkholderia cepacia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the vast differences in their lifestyles, these plant pathogens share a common dilemma: They need to physically interact with the host plant, thereby generating wounds and releasing components from the plant surface, which allow the plant to recognize the invasion. Furthermore, exposed microbial surface structures and essential components, such as the major protein of bacterial flagellae, flagellin (Gomez-Gomez and Boller, 2002), or the outermembrane lipooligosaccharides of gram-negative bacteria (Gerber and Dubery, 2004;Gross et al, 2005), can serve as vehicles to launch the plant defense response. These molecules possess crucial basic functions for the microbe without being specifically intended for the interaction and have been termed microbe-or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs; Nü rnberger and Lipka, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vast differences in their lifestyles, these plant pathogens share a common dilemma: They need to physically interact with the host plant, thereby generating wounds and releasing components from the plant surface, which allow the plant to recognize the invasion. Furthermore, exposed microbial surface structures and essential components, such as the major protein of bacterial flagellae, flagellin (Gomez-Gomez and Boller, 2002), or the outermembrane lipooligosaccharides of gram-negative bacteria (Gerber and Dubery, 2004;Gross et al, 2005), can serve as vehicles to launch the plant defense response. These molecules possess crucial basic functions for the microbe without being specifically intended for the interaction and have been termed microbe-or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/PAMPs; Nü rnberger and Lipka, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] However, some of the responses seemed to be specific to LPS of the pathogen Pectobaterium (e.g. PCD), or non-pathogenic bacteria (e.g., medium alkalization), when other shared responses (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Nevertheless, LPS from different bacterial species can trigger or potentiate PTI and several studies show their implication into the mechanism of plant defense activation. [15][16][17] Lipopolysaccharides have been reported to induce an oxidative burst, NO production, calcium influx, alkalization of the extracellular medium, pathogenesis-related (PR) gene expression and cell wall alterations that include the deposition of callose and phenolics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses suggest that the resistance mechanism in «Hydra» is more efficient than in «Bysra», since it affects all the tested components. The difference of the resistance mechanism could be due to the protein phosphorylation which plays an important regulatory role in the delivery and response to different biotic stress signals, and also induces a variety of stress signal-induced gene expressions (Gerber and Dubery, 2004). The cultivar «Hydra» could also affect the number of pathogen genotypes with matching virulence gene(s) that they may possibly not proliferate during the vegetation season to substantial level in the population and in turn would not enhance epidemic level of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%