2017
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein efficiency in intensive dairy production: a Swedish example

Abstract: Dairy cows in high-yielding, intensive production systems such as those used in Sweden have the capacity to convert low-value inedible protein into high-value edible protein. However, a minor part of the dairy cow diet is edible for humans and this fraction must be minimised to justify dairy production. These results are in line with previous findings on protein conversion efficiency and add scientific input to the debate on sustainable food systems and sustainable diets. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall level of ECM yield in the present study was higher than in the studies by Maxin et al (2013) and Ertl et al (2015Ertl et al ( , 2016; this could be explained by lactation stage, breeds, or different nutritional factors. Interestingly, previous calculations of HeFCE for protein showed that lower milk production gave higher protein conversion efficiency for all diets compared (Swensson et al, 2017). Similarly, Patel et al (2017a) found that a low-yielding and more extensive dairy production system was also the most efficient with regard to both protein and EAA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The overall level of ECM yield in the present study was higher than in the studies by Maxin et al (2013) and Ertl et al (2015Ertl et al ( , 2016; this could be explained by lactation stage, breeds, or different nutritional factors. Interestingly, previous calculations of HeFCE for protein showed that lower milk production gave higher protein conversion efficiency for all diets compared (Swensson et al, 2017). Similarly, Patel et al (2017a) found that a low-yielding and more extensive dairy production system was also the most efficient with regard to both protein and EAA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Over the whole lactation, the 6kgConc cows consumed on average 83% forage (DM basis), whereas the corresponding value for the 12kgConc cows was 68% forage. Both diets can be considered high-forage diets compared with the typical diet of Swedish dairy cows (Emanuelson et al, 2006;Swensson et al, 2017) and dairy cows in other intensive nongrazing production systems (FAO, 2014). Cows offered the 6kgConc diet had higher forage intake, but did not manage to fully replace the lower concentrate ration with forage, and thus total DMI was lower for cows on the 6kgConc diet than for cows offered the 12kgConc diet (Table 3).…”
Section: Feed Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toutefois, certains systèmes herbagers qui utilisent de grandes quantités de concentrés consommables par l'Homme peuvent s'avérer consommateurs nets de protéines consommables. C'est par exemple le cas d'un système suédois qui utilise de grandes quantités de féverole qui est consommable par l'Homme dans l'objectif de réduire les tourteaux importés (Swensson et al, 2017) ou de certains systèmes polyculture-élevages français (Laisse et al, 2016). Les systèmes basés sur l'ensilage de maïs utilisent généralement plus de tourteaux de soja, ce qui pénalise leur efficience protéique nette selon nos hypothèses de calcul.…”
Section: Efficience Nette De Conversion Des Protéines Et De L'énergieunclassified